WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 116
Multiple Charges of the Same Offense: Different Victims
The defendant is charged with three separate counts of (name of offense).
The first count of the information in this case charges that:
[READ THE CHARGE IN THE FIRST COUNT.]
The second count of the information in this case charges that:
[READ THE CHARGE IN THE SECOND COUNT.]
The third count of the information in this case charges that:
[READ THE CHARGE IN THE THIRD COUNT.]
CONTINUE WITH ADDITIONAL COUNTS AS NECESSARY
The defendant has entered a plea of not guilty to each of these charges which means the
State must prove every element of each offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
Statutory Definition of the Crime
(Name of offense), as defined in § of the Criminal Code of Wisconsin is
committed by one who (refer to the uniform instruction for the summary definition of the
offense).
State's Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of any count of, the State must prove
by evidence which satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following elements
were present with respect to that count.
Elements of the Crime That the State Must Prove
SET FORTH THE ELEMENTS AS PROVIDED IN THE UNIFORM
INSTRUCTIONS, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS. THE WORDING OF SOME
ELEMENTS MAY NEED TO BE CHANGED TO FIT THIS FORMAT. IF THE
INSTRUCTION CALLS FOR A NAME TO BE USED, IT WILL USUALLY BE
SUFFICIENT TO REFER TO "THE PERSON NAMED IN THAT COUNT." 1
1. As to each count, .
2. As to each count, .
3. As to each count, .
4. As to each count, .
CONTINUE WITH ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS OR COUNTS AS NECESSARY
Jury's Decision
THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS SEPARATE CLOSING PARAGRAPHS
FOR EACH COUNT 2
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all elements of (name of offense)
have been proved as to Count One, you should find the defendant guilty of (name of
offense) as charged in Count One.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty as to Count One.
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all elements of (name of offense)
have been proved as to Count Two, you should find the defendant guilty of (name of
offense) as charged in Count Two.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty as to Count Two.
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that all elements of (name of offense)
have been proved as to Count Three, you should find the defendant guilty of (name of
offense) as charged in Count Three.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty as to Count Three.
CONTINUE WITH ADDITIONAL COUNTS AS NECESSARY
History
Wis JI-Criminal 116 (2004). Release No. 42, 4/2004. © 2004, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
5ecfe010c1ce890f66a307b6d65f6941f27e6374b9457aace8223d286f3257eb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.