WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Criminal 1021
First Degree Reckless Homicide
Statutory Definition of the Crime
First degree reckless homicide, as defined in § 940.02(2) of the Criminal Code of
Wisconsin, is committed by one who causes the death of another human being by delivery2
of a controlled substance in violation of § 961.41, which another human being uses and
dies as a result of that use.3
State’s Burden of Proof
Before you may find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove by
evidence that satisfies you beyond a reasonable doubt that the following five elements4
were present.
Elements of the Crime that the State Must Prove
1. The defendant delivered5 a substance.
“Deliver” means to transfer something from one person to another.6
2. The substance was by itself or contained (name controlled substance).7
[(Name statutorily listed controlled substance) is a controlled substance, the
delivery of which is prohibited by law.]
3. The defendant knew or believed that the substance was by itself or contained
[(name controlled substance)] [a controlled substance. A controlled substance is a
substance the delivery of which is prohibited by law.]8
You cannot look into a person’s mind to determine knowledge or belief. You
may determine knowledge or belief directly or indirectly from all the evidence
concerning this offense. You may consider any statements or conduct of the
defendant which indicate state of mind. You may find knowledge or belief from
such conduct or statements, but you are not required to do so.
4. (Name of victim) used the substance alleged to have been delivered by the
defendant.
5. (Name of victim) died as a result of the use of that substance.
This requires that the use of the controlled substance was a substantial factor
in causing the death.9
[A substantial factor need not be the sole or primary factor causing death.]10
[There may be more than one cause of death. The use of one substance may
produce it, or the use of two or more substances might jointly produce it.]11
IF THE SUBSTANCE ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN DELIVERED BY THE
DEFENDANT IS A COMPOUND, MIXTURE, DILUENT, OR OTHER
SUBSTANCE MIXED OR COMBINED WITH A CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCE, ADD THE FOLLOWING:
[Whether the substance is a (controlled substance) (controlled substance analog) by
itself, or a mixture or combination of a (controlled substance) (controlled substance analog)
with any compound, mixture, diluent or other substance is not relevant as long as (name of
victim) died as a result of using the substance.]12
IF DELIVERY BY MORE THAN ONE PERSON IS INVOLVED, ADD THE
FOLLOWING:13
[It is not required that the defendant delivered the substance directly to (name of
victim). If possession of the substance was transferred more than once before it was used
by (name of victim), each person who transferred possession of that substance has
delivered it.]
Jury’s Decision
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant delivered (name
controlled substance), that the defendant knew that the substance was by itself or contained
[(name controlled substance)] [a controlled substance],14 that (name of victim) used the
substance delivered by the defendant, and that (name of victim) died as a result of that use,
you should find the defendant guilty of first degree reckless homicide.
If you are not so satisfied, you must find the defendant not guilty.
History
Wis JI-Criminal 1021 (1/2024). Release No. 63. Wisconsin Court System, 1/2024. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
9d5b31cf54819510d40ddd5aef2a2187d2a2c37281adddac3ae3354956fddb94
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.