Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Criminal 1

Suggested Instructions

activein force · 2016-06-01 – presentas-observed

The suggestions made here are recommendations only, intended to offer some guidance

as to a logical order for assembling the instructions. Individual practices may vary and may

be equally effective.

Instructions with titles in boldface are those the Committee recommends be given in

every case. The other instructions should be given when supported by the evidence. Not all

possible general instructions are listed here. Omitted are those that are especially tied to

unusual or rarely-occurring factual situations.

50 Preliminary Instruction: Juror's Conduct; Evidence; Transcripts Not

Available; Credibility; Substantive Issues; Opening Statement

100 Opening Instructions

110 - Statement Of The Issues [Number Of Defendants; Lesser Included

125 Offenses; Number Of Counts]

1010 - Instructions Defining The Crime Charged

et seq.

Lesser Included Offenses

Defenses [JI 600 - 885, 950, 951]

Penalty Enhancers [JI 980 - 999A]

140 Burden Of Proof And Presumption Of Innocence

145 Information Not Evidence

247 Verdict As To Defendant Only

103 Evidence Defined

162 Agreed Facts

165 Judicially Noticed Facts

170 Circumstantial Evidence

172 Flight, Escape, Concealment

175 Motive

180 Statements of Defendant

270 Evidence As To Defendant's Character

275 Evidence Of Other Conduct [Required If Requested]

157 Remarks of Counsel

154 Summary of Evidence

155 Exhibits

148 Objections of Counsel; Evidence Received Over Objection

147 Improper Questions

150 Stricken Testimony

190 Weight of Evidence

195 Juror's Knowledge

300 Credibility of Witnesses

315 Defendant Elects Not To Testify [To Be Given Only If Requested By

Defendant]

317 Witness Exercising Privilege Against Self-Incrimination [To Be Given Only If

Requested; Required If Requested]

141 Where Identification Of Defendant Is In Issue

200 Expert Testimony: General

201 Opinion of Non-Expert Witness

205 Expert Testimony: Hypothetical Question

245 Testimony Of Accomplices

320 Impeachment Of Defendant By Prior Inconsistent Statements Which Are

Inadmissible in the State's Case-In-Chief [Required If Requested]

325 Impeachment of Witness: Prior Conviction or Juvenile Adjudication

327 Impeachment Of Defendant As Witness: Prior Conviction or Juvenile

Adjudication

340 Credibility Of Child Witness

160 Closing Arguments of Counsel

460 or Closing Instruction

465

480 - Verdict [Conform To Instruction Selected From 110 - 125]

494

515 Unanimous Verdict and Selection of Presiding Juror

520 Supplemental Instruction On Agreement

522 Polling the Jury

525 or Instruction After Verdict Received

525A

History

Wis JI-Criminal 1 (2016). Release No. 54, 6/2016. © 2016, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Criminal Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
aa6a6f8dcfb36086dec3bcafd957a0265b73f755e8d2ddc55474a88f392ccf72
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.