Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Civil 8104

Eminent Domain: Unity of Use - Two or More Parcels

activein force · 2007-01-01 – presentas-observed

In considering the fair market value of both the entire property and the remaining

property, you must first determine whether the parcels of real estate owned by (plaintiff) were

used as a single unit, or whether they were used as separate units. The fact that the parcels

were touching does not, by itself, make them a single unit, nor does the fact that the parcels

were not touching, by itself, make them separate units. You may consider that they were

touching or separated, in connection with all the credible evidence received in this case, in

determining whether the parcels were used as a single unit or as separate units.

If you determine that two or more parcels of real estate owned by (plaintiff) were used

as a single unit, consider the taking as a partial taking from all of those parcels as the entire

property.

However, if you determine that the parcels of real estate owned by (plaintiff) were

used as separate units, you will then make your determination of fair market value only with

respect to the parcel(s) from which the taking occurred.

In determining the value of the entire property, you may consider it as a single amount

or as the sum of the value of the individual parcels making up the entire property.

History

Wis JI-Civil 8104 (2007). ©2007, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
2a2134a2c254b822894b8118923806bd0ac077633c84a7bb22cb5198563daa98
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.