WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 354
Presumptions: Conflict as to Existence of Basic Fact; No Evidence Introduced from Which Nonexistence of Presumed Fact Could Be Inferred
The law provides (state the presumption).
There is a conflict in the evidence as to whether or not (state the basic fact). There is
evidence from which you may conclude that (state the basic fact); on the other hand, there is
evidence from which you may conclude (state the contrary of the basic fact). You must
resolve this conflict.
If you find that (state the basic fact), you must find that (state the presumed fact).
History
Wis JI-Civil 354 (1991). ©1991, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
daa6b87fab5366585433c4834686ebddc7bfd3e7e0b17db75a5bf84a1743ec26
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.