WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 3304
Lemon Law Claim: Failure to Repair (Relating to Special Verdict Question 6)
If a new vehicle does not conform to an applicable express warranty, the consumer
must report the nonconformity to the manufacturer or any of the manufacturer's authorized
dealers (before the expiration of the warranty) (within one year after first delivery of the
vehicle to the consumer.) The vehicle must also be made available for repair within one year
after first delivery of the vehicle to the consumer.
Any nonconformity reported by the consumer and made available for repair, must be
repaired by the manufacturer or its authorized dealers.
It is undisputed that (dealer) was a manufacturer's authorized dealer.
(Plaintiff) must prove that:
(a) the vehicle did not conform to an applicable express warranty, and
(b) that the nonconformity was reported to the manufacturer or its authorized
dealer before (date), and
(c) that the vehicle was made available for repair 1 of the nonconformity on or
before (date), and
(d) that the nonconformity was not repaired by the manufacturer or its authorized
dealer, and
(e) that the nonconformity continues after expiration of (the warranty period) (one
year).
History
Wis JI-Civil 3304 (2006). ©2006, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
91c3ca5ec53e813a4d45a8b016b88f25c5a6c860d49d3638cf04037d12c54561
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.