Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Civil 3300

Lemon Law Claim: Special Verdict

activein force · 2016-01-01 – presentas-observed

Question 1:

Did (plaintiff)'s vehicle have at least one nonconformity?

Answer:

Yes or No

If you answered question 1 "no," stop here. Do not answer any other questions.

If you answered question 1 "yes," answer questions 2 and 3.

Question 2:

Did the same nonconformity(ies) found to exist in question 1 continue to exist after

the fourth time the vehicle was made available to (defendant) (or authorized dealers)

for repairs?

Answer:

Yes or No

Question 3:

Was (plaintiff)'s vehicle out of service for an aggregate of at least 30 calendar days

(within the term of the warranty) (within the first year after delivery) because of

warranty nonconformity(ies)?

Answer:

Yes or No

If you answered either question 2 or 3 "yes," answer questions 4 and 5.

If you answered both question 2 and 3 "no," do not answer questions 4 and 5 and

answer question 6.

Question 4:

A. What sum of money did (plaintiff) pay as the purchase price for the vehicle?

$

B. What amount of money did plaintiff pay for sales tax?

$

C. What sum was paid by (plaintiff) in finance charges to purchase the vehicle?

$

D. What sum will compensate (plaintiff) for collateral costs in connection with

the repair of any nonconformity?

$

Question 5:

How many miles were on (plaintiff)'s vehicle when a nonconformity was first reported

to (manufacturer or manufacturer's authorized dealer)?

miles

Question 6:

Did (defendant) or its authorized dealers fail to repair any nonconformity in the

(plaintiff)'s vehicle before the expiration (of the warranty) (of one year after

delivery)?

Answer:

Yes or No

If you answered question 6 "yes," answer question 7.

Question 7:

What sum of money, if any, will fairly compensate (plaintiff) for any pecuniary loss?

$

History

Wis JI-Civil 3300 (2016). ©2016, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
6848b85e7e9ae4a5b40045d08bd66437b9a12d2090d8e3b47cadc3095bf304b8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Civil 3300 — Lemon Law Claim: Special Verdict · binding.law