Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Civil 3030

Modification by Mutual Assent

activein force · 1993-01-01 – presentas-observed

One party to an existing contract cannot alter its provisions without the consent of the

other party. In order that any new provisions may become part of an existing contract, it is

necessary that there be a meeting of the minds of the parties on all essential terms and

conditions of the new provisions. The parties must agree that the new provisions are to be

made part of the existing contract. The usual procedure in modifying a contract is for one

party to propose a modification and for the other party to assent to the proposal.

A modification of a contract may be written, oral, or partially written and partially

oral. Regardless of whether a prior contract is oral or written, it may be modified orally.

To constitute a modification, the language used and the conduct of the parties must

show that there has been a meeting of the minds of the parties on all terms of the contract

modification.

[No new consideration is required to support modification of a contract which has not

been fully performed.]

History

Wis JI-Civil 3030 (1993). ©1993, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
a941e6d72a411063d8cdf69d0e0aa06533d6f25cde6cea579a69960ccc69237f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.