Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Civil 3020

Consideration

activein force · 1993-01-01 – presentas-observed

[Insert first paragraph of 3010 and first paragraph of 3012 if desired.]

Consideration is an essential element of a contract; it is necessary to the validity and

enforceability of a contract.

Consideration is the price bargained and paid for a promise – that is, something

intended by the parties to be given in exchange for the promise.

Consideration is an act or a promise which is either a detriment incurred by the

offeree, or a benefit received by the offeror, at the request of the offeror, either of which does

not occur gratuitously, but which is accepted and regarded as consideration by both the

offeror and the offeree. Detriment as used here means any act which occasioned the offeree

the slightest trouble or inconvenience, and which the offeree was not otherwise obliged to

perform or refrain from performing. Benefit as used here means anything of slight or trifling

value to the offeror.

[For a detriment to the offeree, or a benefit to the offeror, to rise to the status of

consideration in a legal sense, the forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility borne by the

one party, or the right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the other party, must not consist

of an already existing legal obligation.]

It is not a proper function of the jury to determine whether the consideration is a fair

and adequate exchange for the promise. Fairness and adequacy are for the offeror and offeree

to judge for themselves. Any legal consideration, no matter how slight, will be sufficient.

However, the mere inconvenience of making or receiving a promise is not itself

consideration. [Love and affection alone are not sufficient to support a contract.]

[If consideration is sufficient in other respects, it does not matter from whom or to

whom it moves. The consideration may move to the offeror or a third person, and may be

given by the offeror or a third person.]

[Mutual promises for the future performance of acts by the parties may constitute

consideration for each other if the promises are capable of being performed, are given in

exchange for each other, and are mutually binding upon the parties. The promises must be

equally binding upon both parties, but it is not necessary that the value of the promises be

equal.]

[Something given or received before the time a promise is made, and therefore

without reference to such promise, is past consideration which is not sufficient to support a

contract.]

[A moral obligation may operate as consideration where the offeror has previously

received a material pecuniary benefit from the offeree who expected to be compensated

therefor and who was not under an existing legal or moral duty to confer the benefit without

compensation. Thus, reaffirmation of a past legal obligation, such as a debt that has been

discharged in bankruptcy, is sufficient consideration.]

[In order that forbearance to sue upon a claim may constitute a valid consideration, the

claim need not be one which could be successfully prosecuted, but the claim must not be

brought in bad faith, or be frivolous or vexatious.]

History

Wis JI-Civil 3020 (1993). ©1993, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
2c4f9f48036d7331abe0b5649f869cde9594b47d6b3d377393e060619616f34c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.