WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 2772
Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law: Special Verdict
Question ____: Did a dealership exist between ( ) and ( )?
ANSWER:
Yes or No
If you answered "yes," to question, then answer the following question:
Question ____: Did (grantor) (e.g. terminate, cancel, fail to renew, substantially change
the competitive circumstances) of the dealership agreement with
(dealer)?
ANSWER:
Yes or No
If you answered "yes," to question, then answer the following question:
Question ____: Was the dealership agreement between (dealer) and (grantor) (e.g.
terminated, cancelled, etc.) by (grantor) for good cause?
ANSWER:
Yes or No
If you answered "no," to question, then answer the following question(s):
[Note: If adequate notice is at issue (see JI-Civil 2771):
Question ____: Did (grantor) fail to provide adequate notice to (dealer) of the (e.g.
termination, cancellation, etc.)?
ANSWER:
Yes or No
[Note: If correction of the deficiency is at issue:
Question ____: Was the deficiency corrected within 60 days?
ANSWER:
Yes or No
Question ____: What sum of money will compensate (dealer) for the termination
(cancellation, etc.) of the dealership agreement by (grantor)?
ANSWER: $
History
Wis JI-Civil 2772 (2005). ©2005, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
cc9e376963fc17ce3609777c15bc10b70de7ed22a95d3808b604faa1019c2b65
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.