Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Civil 2769

Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law: Existence of Dealership

activein force · 2020-01-01 – presentas-observed

Question _____ of the special verdict asks whether a dealership [was established]

[existed] between ( ) and ( ).

To find that a dealership existed between ( ) and ( ) you must

determine that two elements were present:

• A contract or agreement existed in which (dealer) was given the right by

(grantor) to [sell or distribute (a product) (a service)] [or] [use a trade name,

trademark, service mark, logotype, advertising or other commercial

symbol]. The contract or agreement may be written or oral; and

• A community of interest existed between (grantor) and (dealer). This

means the parties shared a continuing financial interest in which the parties

cooperated and coordinated their activities in operating the dealership

business or marketing the dealership’s (goods) (or) (services) and share

common goals in their business relationship.

In determining if a community of interest existed between (dealer) and (grantor),

among the things you should consider are:

• How long the parties dealt with each other;

• The extent and nature of the obligations imposed on the parties in any

contract or agreement between them;

The percentage of time or revenue the (dealer) devoted to (grantor)’s products or

services;

• The percentage of the gross proceeds or profits (dealer) derived from

(grantor)’s products or services;

• The extent and nature of (grantor)’s grant of territory to (dealer);

• The extent and nature of (dealer)’s uses of (grantor)’s proprietary marks

(such as trademarks or logos);

• The extent and nature of (dealer)’s financial investment in inventory,

facilities, and good will of the alleged dealership;

• The personnel which (dealer) devotes to the alleged dealership;

• How much (dealer) spent on advertising or promotional expenditures for

the (grantor)’s products or services;

• The extent and nature of any supplementary services provided by (dealer)

to consumers of (grantor)’s products or services.

SPECIAL VERDICT

See Wis JI-Civil 2772.

History

Wis JI-Civil 2769 (2020). ©2020, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
ddee2eeebc8d569bc4ed766eb47a915d26d329c93c8859445d0ec146232e6e0a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.