WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 261
Medical or Scientific Treatise in Evidence
During the trial, the court received portions of a published treatise in evidence written
by. This evidence was not received to establish that the views expressed by the
author are undisputed truths or absolute standards. The author's views should be considered
as any other expert witness' opinion.
You are not bound by the opinions expressed by the author any more than you are
bound by the opinion of any other expert witness.
History
Wis JI-Civil 261 (1989). ©1989, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
087fbf93904425e019e7b98410a1dad405431b43fbe27a31cd165b6414f3ab00
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.