WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 2006
Battery: Self-Defense
(Defendant) claims that any injury to (plaintiff) was inflicted by (defendant) in
self-defense.
“Self-defense” is the right to defend one’s person by the use of whatever force is
reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
If (defendant) reasonably believed that (his) (her) life was in danger or that (he) (she)
was likely to suffer bodily harm, then (defendant) had a right to defend (himself) (herself)
by the use of force as under the circumstances (he) (she) reasonably believed was
necessary. (Defendant), who alleges that (he) (she) acted in self-defense, has the burden of
proof to satisfy you by the greater weight of the credible evidence, to a reasonable certainty,
that (he) (she) reasonably believed that the use of some force was necessary to prevent
injury and also that the amount of force used by (defendant) was reasonable under the
circumstances.
A belief may be reasonable even though mistaken. In determining whether the
defendant’s beliefs were reasonable, the standard is what a person of ordinary intelligence
and prudence would have believed in the defendant’s position under the circumstances that
existed at the time of the alleged offense. The reasonableness of the defendant’s beliefs
must be determined from the standpoint of the defendant at the time of the defendant’s acts
and not from the viewpoint of the jury now.
In determining whether the force used by (defendant) was reasonably necessary, you
may consider the actions of (plaintiff), the force or threat of force used by (plaintiff), the
amount of force used by (defendant), the means or instrument by which the force was
applied, as well as the relative strength and size of (plaintiff) and (defendant).
If you determine that the (defendant) acted in self-defense, then you should answer
“Yes” to Question No. _____, if you are required to answer that question.
SPECIAL VERDICT
Question No. 1.
Did (defendant) commit a battery on (plaintiff) on [date of alleged battery]?
Answer: _______________
Yes or No
If you answered “Yes” to Question No. 1, then answer Question No. 2.
Question No. 2.
Was the battery a cause of (plaintiff)’s injuries?
Answer: _______________
Yes or No
If you answered “Yes” to Question No. 2, then answer Question No. 3.
Question No. 3.
Did (defendant) act in self-defense when (he) (she) struck (plaintiff) on [date of alleged
battery]?
Answer: _______________
Yes or No
History
Wis JI-Civil 2006 (11/2025). Release No. 59. Wisconsin Court System, 11/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
4f67c13a9dd12b3cec9bb4db87d6983912e444b0dc6f6882e0799b69627612ac
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.