WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1926
Private Nuisance: Intentional Conduct
To sustain a claim of nuisance in this case, (plaintiff) must prove the following four
elements:
First, a private nuisance exist(s)(ed)2. A private nuisance is an (invasion of or)
interference with (plaintiff’s) interest in the private use and enjoyment of (his) (her) (their)
land.3
Second, the (invasion or) interference resulted in significant harm.4 “Significant harm”
means harm involving more than a slight inconvenience or petty annoyance. When the
interference involves personal discomfort or annoyance, it is sometimes difficult to
determine whether the (invasion or) interference is significant. If ordinary persons living
in the community would regard the (invasion or) interference as substantially offensive,
seriously annoying or intolerable, then the (invasion or) interference is significant. If not,
then the (invasion or) interference is not significant. Rights and privileges to use and enjoy
land are based on the general standards of ordinary persons in the community and not on
the standards of persons who are more sensitive than ordinary persons.
Third, (defendant) intentionally caused the private nuisance. A person’s conduct
caused the private nuisance if it was a substantial factor in producing the nuisance.
A nuisance is intentional if the person acts for the purpose of causing the nuisance or knows
that the nuisance is resulting or is substantially certain to result from the person’s conduct.5
Fourth, (defendant’s) conduct in causing the nuisance was unreasonable.6 An
intentional invasion of another’s interest in the use and enjoyment of land is unreasonable
if:
(a) the gravity of the harm outweighs the utility of the actor’s conduct, or
(b) the harm caused by the conduct is serious and the cost of compensating for this and
similar harm to others would still make it feasible for (defendant) to continue the conduct.7
VERDICT
Question No. 1: Did [Does] a private nuisance exist?
ANSWER: _________
(Yes/No)
Question No. 2: If you answered “Yes” to Question 1, then answer this question:
Did the nuisance result in significant harm to (plaintiff)?8
ANSWER: _________
(Yes/No)
Question No. 3: If you answered “Yes” to Question 2, then answer this question:
Did (defendant) intentionally cause the private nuisance?
ANSWER: _________
(Yes/No)
Question No. 4: If you answered “Yes” to Question 3, then answer this question:
Was (defendant’s) conduct in causing the nuisance unreasonable?
ANSWER: _________
(Yes/No)
Question No. 5: Regardless of how you answered any of the other questions, answer this
question:
What sum of money will reasonably compensate (plaintiff) for harm suffered?
ANSWER: $_____________
History
Wis JI-Civil 1926 (2/2025). Release No. 58. Wisconsin Court System, 2/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
6c9ce963ce075de5ecf5158ce6e3f2e5f20241271bb59e98dd4b0e1bb0bae248
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.