WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1815
Injury to Spouse: Loss of Consortium
"Consortium" involves the love and affection, the companionship and society, the
privileges of sexual relations, the comfort, aid, advice and solace, the rendering of material
services, the right of support, and any other elements that normally arise in a close, intimate,
and harmonious marriage relationship. A wrongful invasion, impairment, or deprivation of
any of these rights, resulting from a disabling injury to a spouse, is a legal loss and a basis for
damages to the other spouse harmed or deprived.
In answering this question, you should consider the nature, the form, and quality of the
relationship that existed between (the spouses) up to the time of the injury. Based on that
relationship, determine what sum will represent fair and reasonable compensation for any
loss of consortium that was sustained by the deprived spouse as a result of the injury.
If you find that the loss will continue in the future, include in your answer damages for
the period you are convinced it will continue to exist.
Compensation for loss of consortium, except as it relates to material services, is not
measured by any rule of market value. Instead, it is measured on the basis of what you find is
fair and reasonable compensation for the loss sustained by the deprived spouse.
Compensation for material services is to be measured by what it would reasonably cost in the
market for like services.
So as not to duplicate damages, do not include in your answer any allowance for loss
of earnings or loss of earning capacity of the injured spouse. Those damages are dealt with in
another question.
History
Wis JI-Civil 1815 (2012). ©2012, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
92183b0259eca8f60709c89f24f801f2247b047c34073a908f798c993ad17fe6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.