WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1757
Personal Injuries: Past Health Care Expenses (Medical Negligence Cases) (Negligence of Long-Term Care Provider): Collateral Sources
(Question _____) (Subdivision _____ of Question _____) asks what sum of money
will fairly and reasonably compensate (plaintiff) for past health care services?
A person injured by medical negligence (the negligence of a long-term care provider)
may recover the reasonable value of health care services reasonably required as a result of the
injury. Billing statements (which may include invoices) for health care services (plaintiff) has
received since (insert event giving rise to the medical negligence/the negligence of a long-term care provider) have been admitted into evidence.
[NOTE: Use the following paragraph if no evidence has been received disputing
the value, reasonableness, or necessity of health care services provided to plaintiff:
These billing statements establish the value, reasonableness, and necessity of health care
services provided to (plaintiff). You must still determine whether the health care services
were provided for the injuries sustained by (plaintiff) as a result of the (treatment) (diagnosis)
by (__________).]
[NOTE: Use the following paragraph if evidence has been received disputing the
value, reasonableness, or necessity of health care services provided to plaintiff: The
party challenging the (value of) (reasonableness and necessity of) (plaintiff)'s past health care
services has the burden to prove they were not (reasonable in amount) (reasonably and
necessarily provided to care for (plaintiff)). Unless you are satisfied by the greater weight of
the credible evidence, to a reasonable certainty, that the billing statements (were not
reasonable in amount) (do not reflect health care services reasonably and necessarily
provided to care for (plaintiff)), you must find (the billing statements reflect the reasonable
value of the health care services) (the health care services reflected in the billing statements
were reasonably and necessarily provided to care for (plaintiff)). You must still determine
whether the health care services were provided for the injuries sustained by (plaintiff) as a
result of the (treatment) (diagnosis) by (__________)].
The reasonable value of health care services made necessary by (medical negligence)
(the negligence of a long-term care provider) may be awarded even though (plaintiff) did not
incur any expense, obligation, or liability to pay for those services.
Evidence has also been received of payments made by (list sources) to (plaintiff) or on
behalf of (plaintiff) for health care services.
[Evidence has also been received of services provided at no charge to (plaintiff) by
(list providers).]
The evidence of payments by (list sources) has been received for the sole purpose of
assisting you in determining the reasonable value of the services reasonably required by the
injury. You may not reduce the reasonable value of the health care services on the basis of
payments made by (list sources.)
Also (list subrogated entities) may be entitled to recover repayment or reimbursement
of any amounts which you determine were the result of (the medical negligence) (the
negligence of a long-term care provider).
History
Wis JI-Civil 1757 (2013). ©2013, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
845828a86c2b8169fdfc1f609661ecf8b3f24a5e97cba78bafcb26d282adc26f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.