Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Civil 1742

Personal Injuries: Medical Care: Offsetting Benefit from Operation Against Damages for Negligence in Informing the Patient

activein force · 2015-01-01 – presentas-observed

(Note: This instruction will usually follow other instructions on damages.)

If you are satisfied that the (operation) (procedure) (treatment), even though not

consented to by (patient), resulted in benefit to (patient), you may consider the value of the

benefit and offset the value of the benefit against any damage to (patient).

In determining whether there should be any offset of benefit against damages, you

should consider the nature of the (operation) (procedure) (treatment), (patient)'s condition

before the (operation) (procedure) (treatment), and (patient)'s condition after the (operation)

(procedure) (treatment). In comparing the benefit and damages, you must consider, on the

basis of (medical) (chiropractic) (dental) (optometric) (podiatric) evidence, what (patient)'s

condition would have been had the operation not been performed.

[If you find that benefits exceed damages, you must find that (patient) has suffered no

damage.]

History

Wis JI-Civil 1742 (2015). ©2015, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
4a0e336e19028f7b2129dd8670138c646fe384343b95f030db6d7745b4504d70
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Civil 1742 — Personal Injuries: Medical Care:… · binding.law