WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1707A
Punitive Damages: Products Liability [For Actions Commenced Before May 17, 1995]
Punitive damages may be awarded, in addition to compensatory damages, if you find
that the defendant's conduct was outrageous.
A person's conduct is outrageous if the person acts either maliciously or in wanton,
willful, or reckless disregard of the plaintiff's rights. Acts are malicious when they are the
result of hatred, ill will, a desire for revenge, or inflicted under circumstances where insult or
injury is intended. A person's conduct is wanton, willful, and in reckless disregard of the
plaintiff's rights when it demonstrates an indifference on (his) (her) part to the consequences
of (his) (her) actions, even though (he) (she) may not intend insult or injury. The purpose of
punitive damages is to punish a wrongdoer or deter the wrongdoer and others from engaging
in similar conduct in the future. Punitive damages are not awarded to compensate the
plaintiff for any loss (he) (she) has sustained.
A plaintiff is not entitled to punitive damages as a matter of right. Even if you find
that the defendant acted maliciously or in wanton, willful, or reckless disregard of the
plaintiff's rights, you do not have to award punitive damages. Such damages may be awarded
or withheld at your discretion. You may not, however, award punitive damages unless you
have awarded compensatory damages.
If you determine that punitive damages should be awarded, you may then award such
sum as will accomplish the purpose of punishing or deterring wrongful conduct. Factors you
should consider in answering this question include:
1. the seriousness of the hazard to the public;
2. the profitability of the misconduct;
3. the attitude and conduct on discovery of the misconduct;
4. the degree of the manufacturer's awareness of the hazard and of its excessiveness;
5. the employees involved in causing or concealing the misconduct;
6. the duration of both the improper behavior and its concealment;
7. the financial condition of the manufacturer and the probable effect on the
manufacturer of a particular judgment; and
8. the total punishment the manufacturer will probably receive from other sources.
(Burden of Proof, Middle Burden, use Wis JI-Civil 210.)
SPECIAL VERDICT
If you answered "yes" to question ,* answer this question:
Was (defendant)'s conduct outrageous?
Answer:
Yes or No
If you answered the preceding question "yes," answer this question:
What sum, if any, do you assess against (defendant) as punitive damages?
Answer: $
*This question blank refers to the cause question relating to defendant's negligence.
History
Wis JI-Civil 1707A (1996). ©1996, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
750e0a8a0b2711b88556ec068d7ede14d740fe5b839199d505c701ce7e7b0435
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.