WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1707.2
Punitive Damages: Products Liability
Punitive damages may be awarded, in addition to compensatory damages, if you find
that the defendant acted maliciously toward the plaintiff or in an intentional disregard of the
rights of the plaintiff.
A person's acts are malicious when they are the result of hatred, ill will, desire for
revenge, or inflicted under circumstances where insult or injury is intended.
A person acts in an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff if the person acts
with the purpose to disregard the plaintiff's rights, or is aware that his or her acts are
substantially certain to result in the plaintiff's rights being disregarded. Before you can find
an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff, you must be satisfied that the
defendant's act or course of conduct was:
(1) deliberate;
(2) an actual disregard of the plaintiff's right to safety, health, or life, a property
right, or some other right; and
(3) sufficiently aggravated to warrant punishment by punitive damages.
A defendant's conduct giving rise to punitive damages need not be directed at the
plaintiff seeking punitive damages. There is no requirement that the defendant intended to
cause harm or injury to the plaintiff.
The purpose of punitive damages is to punish a wrongdoer or deter the wrongdoer and
others from engaging in similar conduct in the future. Punitive damages are not awarded to
compensate the plaintiff for any loss he or she has sustained. A plaintiff is not entitled to
punitive damages as a matter of right. Even if you find that the defendant acted maliciously
or in an intentional disregard of the plaintiff's rights, you do not have to award punitive
damages. Punitive damages may be awarded or withheld at your discretion. You may not,
however, award punitive damages unless you have awarded compensatory damages.
If you determine that punitive damages should be awarded, you may then award such
sum as will accomplish the purpose of punishing or deterring wrongful conduct. Factors you
should consider in answering question _____ include:
1. the seriousness of the hazard to the public;
2. the profitability of the misconduct;
3. the attitude and conduct on discovery of the misconduct;
4. the degree of the manufacturer's awareness of the hazard and of its excessiveness;
5. the employees involved in causing or concealing the misconduct;
6. the duration of both the improper behavior and its concealment;
7. the financial condition of the manufacturer and the probable effect on the
manufacturer of a particular judgment; and
8. the total punishment the manufacturer will probably receive from other sources.
(Burden of Proof, Middle Burden, use Wis JI-Civil 205)
SPECIAL VERDICT
If you answered "yes" to question ,* answer this question:
Did (defendant) act maliciously toward (plaintiff) or in an intentional disregard
of the rights of (plaintiff)?
Answer:
Yes or No
*This blank refers to the question(s) to which a "yes" answer would support an award of
punitive damages.
If you answered the preceding question "yes," answer this question:
What sum, if any, do you award against (defendant) as punitive damages?
Answer: $___________
History
Wis JI-Civil 1707.2 (2008). ©2008, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
7119eb7b0226c02dd2e4caec29fae1838da9ea85caa10dca6ba27c3d874fd546
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.