WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1707.1
Punitive Damages: Nonproducts Liability
Punitive damages may be awarded, in addition to compensatory damages, if you find
that the defendant acted maliciously toward the plaintiff or in an intentional disregard of the
rights of the plaintiff.
A person's acts are malicious when they are the result of hatred, ill will, desire for
revenge, or inflicted under circumstances where insult or injury is intended.
A person acts in an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff if the person acts
with the purpose to disregard the plaintiff's rights, or is aware that his or her acts are
substantially certain to result in the plaintiff's rights being disregarded. Before you can find
an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff, you must be satisfied that the
defendant's act or course of conduct was:
(1) deliberate;
(2) an actual disregard of the plaintiff's right to safety, health, or life, a property
right, or some other right; and
(3) sufficiently aggravated to warrant punishment by punitive damages.
A defendant's conduct giving rise to punitive damages need not be directed at the
plaintiff seeking punitive damages. There is no requirement that (defendant) intended to
cause harm or injury to (plaintiff).
The purpose of punitive damages is to punish a wrongdoer or deter the wrongdoer and
others from engaging in similar conduct in the future. Punitive damages are not awarded to
compensate the plaintiff for any loss he or she has sustained. A plaintiff is not entitled to
punitive damages as a matter of right. Even if you find that the defendant acted maliciously
or in an intentional disregard of the plaintiff's rights, you do not have to award punitive
damages. Punitive damages may be awarded or withheld at your discretion. You may not,
however, award punitive damages unless you have awarded compensatory damages.
If you determine that punitive damages should be awarded, you should determine the
amount you believe will accomplish the purpose of punishing or deterring wrongful conduct.
Factors you should consider in answering question _____ include:
1. the grievousness of the defendant's acts,
2. the degree of malice involved,
3. the potential damage which might have been done by such acts as well as the
actual damage, and
4. the defendant's ability to pay. You may consider the defendant's wealth in
determining what sum of punitive damages will be enough to punish the
defendant and deter the defendant and others from the same conduct in the future.
[The law provides that punitive damage may not exceed twice the amount of
compensatory damages you have awarded the plaintiff or $200,000.00, whichever is greater.
These dollar limitations are not a measure of damages, but a limit on recovery. You should
determine the amount, if any, you believe should be awarded in punitive damages.]1
(Burden of Proof, Middle Burden, use Wis JI-Civil 205)
SPECIAL VERDICT
If you answered "yes" to question ,* answer this question:
Did (defendant) act maliciously toward (plaintiff) or in an intentional disregard of
the rights of (plaintiff)?
Answer:___________
Yes or No
*[Note: This blank refers to the question(s) to which a "yes" answer would support an award
of punitive damages.]
If you answered the preceding question "yes," answer this question:
What sum, if any, do you award against (defendant) as punitive damages?
Answer:$__________
[Note: See Note 2 below if the claim involves operation of a vehicle while under the
influence.]2
History
Wis JI-Civil 1707.1 (2018). ©2018, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
75ad386a9ce307f296dae005a4176b121b4ec4ffd5d8504173f25eae4977ab3e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.