WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Civil 1190.5
Plaintiff and Defendant Each Claims Green Light in Their Favor
Both operators claim that the green traffic light (or “Go” signal) was facing them as
they proceeded to cross the intersection in question. It was a physical impossibility for this
to happen, in the absence of evidence that the lights were not in good working order. It is
for you to determine which operator the green light was facing and which operator, at that
same time, the red light was facing as each operator proceeded into the intersection.
History
Wis JI-Civil 1190.5 (2022). Release No. 53. Wisconsin Court System, 2022. Prepared by the Wisconsin Civil Jury Instructions Committee of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
a3dfdd9dab88b85d0f4e9a87511ade520b55ead6fcf7e1b0fa11dea1899b5d4a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.