WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Children 424
Indian Child Welfare: Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights: "Active Efforts" [Wis. Stat. § 48.028 (4)(e)2.]
Question ____ asks:
Have active efforts been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitation
programs designed to prevent the breakup of (Indian child)’s family2?
If the answer to Question ___ is “yes,” answer the following question:
Have the efforts to provide remedial services and rehabilitation programs designed to
prevent the breakup of (Indian child)’s family proved unsuccessful?
[“Remedial services and rehabilitation programs” are services to give support to
families to help them become safe placements for a child.3 The intention of these services
is to provide support to a family to prevent the removal of a child by “rehabilitating” or
strengthening the family in their parenting and other related skills, and to provide support
that assists in “remediating” or correcting the situation in a home that led to the removal of
a child.]
“Active efforts” means affirmative, active, thorough, and timely efforts intended
primarily to maintain or reunite an Indian child with his or her family. “Active efforts”
must involve assisting the parent or parents or Indian custodian through the steps of a case
plan and with accessing or developing the resources necessary to satisfy the case plan and
are to be tailored to the facts and circumstances of the case.4
To find that “active efforts” have been made, you must determine that there has been
an ongoing, vigorous, and concerted level of case work and that the active efforts were
made in a manner that takes into account the prevailing social and cultural values,
conditions, and way of life of the Indian child’s Tribe and that utilizes the available
resources of the Indian child’s Tribe, tribal and other Indian child welfare agencies,
extended family members of the Indian child, other individual Indian caregivers, and other
culturally appropriate service providers.5
Your consideration of whether active efforts were made shall include whether all of
the following activities were conducted6:
1. Representatives designated by the Indian child’s Tribe with substantial knowledge
of the prevailing social and cultural standards and child-rearing practice within the tribal
community were requested to evaluate the circumstances of the Indian child’s family and
to assist in developing a case plan that uses the resources of the Tribe and of the Indian
community, including traditional and customary support, actions, and services, to address
those circumstances.
2. A comprehensive assessment of the situation of the Indian child’s family was
completed, including a determination of the likelihood of protecting the Indian child’s
health, safety, and welfare effectively in the Indian child’s home.
3. Representatives of the Indian child’s Tribe were identified, notified, and invited
to participate in all aspects of the Indian child custody proceeding at the earliest possible
point in the proceeding and their advice was actively solicited throughout the proceeding.
4. Extended family members of the Indian child, including extended family members
who were identified by the Indian child’s Tribe or parents, were notified and consulted
with to identify and provide family structure and support for the Indian child, to assure
cultural connections, and to serve as placement resources for the Indian child.
5. Arrangements were made to provide natural and unsupervised family interaction
in the most natural setting that can ensure the Indian child’s safety, as appropriate to the
goals of the Indian child’s permanency plan, including arrangements for transportation and
other assistance to enable family members to participate in that interaction.
6. All available family preservation strategies were offered or employed and the
involvement of the Indian child’s Tribe was requested to identify those strategies and to
ensure that those strategies are culturally appropriate to the Indian child’s Tribe.
7. Community resources offering housing, financial, and transportation assistance
and in-home support services, in-home intensive treatment services, community support
services, and specialized services for members of the Indian child’s family with special
needs were identified, information about those resources was provided to the Indian child’s
family, and the Indian child’s family was actively assisted or offered active assistance in
accessing those resources.
8. Monitoring of client progress and client participation in services was provided.
9. A consideration of alternative ways of addressing the needs of the Indian child’s
family was provided, if services did not exist or if existing services were not available to
the family.
[If one or more of the listed activities were not accomplished, give the following:
In your consideration of whether active efforts were made to provide services and
programs designed to prevent the breakup of the family, you may take into consideration
that some of the nine activities were not accomplished and the reasons they were not
accomplished. You may still find that active efforts were made after considering all
evidence bearing on the question, including whether you are satisfied with the reasons
given as to why some activities were not accomplished.]7
History
Wis JI-Children 424 (2/2025). Release No. 4. Wisconsin Court System, 2/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Jury Instructions Committees of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
36e889dc64cc5e49f683d19f0a7a68b1f6d122160a6eeba506b86ca37700447d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.