WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Children 280
Unborn Child in Need of Protection or Services
The petition in this case alleges that the unborn child of (expectant mother) is in need
of protection or services. Your role as jurors will be to answer the following questions in the
special verdict:
1. Does (expectant mother) habitually lack self-control in the use of (alcohol
beverages) (controlled substances) (controlled substance analogs) exhibited to a
severe degree?
If the answer to question 1 is "yes," answer question 2:
2. Does (expectant mother)'s habitual lack of self-control in using (e.g., alcohol
beverages) present a substantial risk that the physical health of the unborn child, and
of the child when born, will be seriously affected or endangered unless (expectant
mother) receives prompt and adequate treatment for the habitual lack of self-control?
In answering question 1, the term "habitually" means conduct established by or
repeated by force of habit. "Self-control" means control of oneself as shown by restraint
exercised over one's own impulses, emotions, or desires. In determining whether a lack of
self-control is exhibited to a severe degree, you may consider the frequency of use, the
duration of the use, and the amount used. In answering question 1, you must consider the
facts and circumstances as they existed on (_________________), which was the date on
which this petition was filed. Your answer must reflect your finding as of that date.
If you are to answer question 2, the term "substantial risk" means that a significant and
appreciable threat exists. The physical health of an unborn child and the child when born is
seriously affected or endangered if the expectant mother's failure to receive prompt and
adequate treatment for the lack of self-control in using (alcohol beverages) (controlled
substances) (controlled substance analogs) creates a significant risk that the unborn child and
the child when born will be seriously harmed. However, actual harm or injury need not have
occurred. In determining whether the physical health of the unborn child and the child when
born is seriously affected or endangered, you may consider the natural and probable
consequences of the failure to promptly receive adequate treatment. In answering question 2,
you may consider all evidence bearing on that question, including evidence of events and
conduct occurring since the filing of the petition on (________________). Your answer must
reflect your finding as of today's date.
Before you may answer either question in the special verdict "yes," you must be
convinced by evidence that is clear, satisfactory, and convincing, to a reasonable certainty,
that the question should be answered "yes." If you are not so convinced, you must answer the
question "no."
SPECIAL VERDICT
1. Does (expectant mother) habitually lack self-control in the use of (alcohol
beverages) (controlled substances) (controlled substance analogs) exhibited to a
severe degree?
Answer:__________________
Yes or No
If the answer to question 1 is "yes," answer question 2:
2. Does (expectant mother)'s habitual lack of self-control in using (e.g., alcohol
beverages) present a substantial risk that the physical health of the unborn child, and
of the child when born, will be seriously affected or endangered unless (expectant
mother) receives prompt and adequate treatment for the habitual lack of self-control?
Answer:__________________
Yes or No
History
Wis JI-Children 280 (2009). ©2009, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Jury Instructions Committees of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
3ec64b832bb0397dcd9401f9b8cc57086873a5fcf2a4cc7c0cae5c62daecd8b0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.