WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Children 260
Emotional Damage
The petition in this case alleges that (child) is suffering emotional damage for which
(his) (her) (parent) 1 has neglected, refused, or been unable, for reasons other than poverty, to
obtain necessary treatment or to take necessary steps to ameliorate (child)'s symptoms.2 Your
role as jurors will be to answer the following questions in the special verdict:
1. As of [the date the petition was filed], was (child) suffering emotional damage?
2. As of [the date the petition was filed], was (parent) failing, 3 for reasons other than
poverty, 4 to obtain necessary treatment or to take necessary steps to ameliorate
(child)'s symptoms.
The burden of proof is on (petitioner) to convince you by evidence that is clear,
satisfactory, and convincing, to a reasonable certainty, that the questions should be answered
"yes."
"Emotional damage" means harm to a child's psychological or intellectual functioning.
"Emotional damage" must be evidenced by one or more of the following characteristics
exhibited to a severe degree: anxiety, depression, withdrawal, outward aggressive behavior,
or a substantial and observable change in behavior, emotional response, or cognition that is
not within the normal range for the child's age and stage of development. 5
In determining whether treatment or steps 6 would "ameliorate" the child's symptoms,
you are to consider whether the treatment or steps would reduce or eliminate the child's
symptoms. 7
A parent failed, for reasons other than poverty, to obtain necessary treatment or to take
necessary steps to ameliorate (his) (her) child's symptoms if the following are established:
1. that there was treatment or were steps that could have been taken to reduce or
eliminate the child's symptoms; 8
2. that the parent was aware of the treatment or the steps and the availability of the
treatment or steps;
3. that the parent failed to provide the treatment or take the steps; and
4. that the parent's failure to provide the treatment or take the steps was
unreasonable and was not due to the financial inability of the parent to afford
the treatment or take the steps.
In determining whether a failure by (parent) was unreasonable, you may consider the
circumstances surrounding a failure to obtain treatment or to take steps, including whether
the treatment or steps are generally accepted in the practice of psychology or psychiatry;
whether the treatment or the taking of these steps carry possible risks or side effects to
(child); 9 and the reduction of symptoms likely to result from the treatment or the taking of the
necessary steps.
Before you may answer either question in the special verdict "yes," you must be
convinced by evidence that is clear, satisfactory, and convincing, to a reasonable certainty,
that the question should be answered "yes." If you are not so convinced, you must answer the
question "no."
SPECIAL VERDICT
1. As of [the date the petition was filed], was (child) suffering emotional damage?
Answer:__________________
Yes or No
2. As of [the date the petition was filed], was (parent) failing, for reasons other than
poverty, to obtain necessary treatment or to take necessary steps to ameliorate (child)'s
symptoms.
Answer:__________________
Yes or No
History
Wis JI-Children 260 (2008). ©2008, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Jury Instructions Committees of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
7e81b916d15ef9eb701c1801c1925d61e9ac2c80459696be3572e47065a89a6f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.