WI · jury_instructions
Wis JI-Children 250
CHIPS: Parental Neglect, Refusal, or Inability to Provide - Wis. Stat. 48.13(10)
The petition in this case alleges that (parent)1 neglects, refuses, or is unable for reasons
other than poverty to provide necessary [care, food, clothing, medical or dental care or
shelter] for (child) so as to seriously endanger (child)’s physical health. Your role as jurors
will be to answer the following question in the special verdict:
1. Did (parent) neglect, refuse, or was (he) (she) unable for reasons other than
poverty to provide necessary [care, food, clothing, medical or dental care or
shelter] for (child) so as to seriously endanger (child)’s physical health?
The burden of proof is on (petitioner) to convince you by evidence that is clear,
satisfactory, and convincing, to a reasonable certainty, that the question should be answered
“yes.”
Before you may answer this question “yes,” you must be convinced by evidence that
is clear, satisfactory, and convincing, to a reasonable certainty, that the following two
elements have been proved:
First, that (parent) neglected, refused, or was unable for reasons other than poverty to
provide necessary [care, food, clothing, medical or dental care or shelter] for (child).2
Second, that the failure to provide seriously endangered the (child)’s physical health.
The first element requires that you find that (parent)3 failed to provide necessary [care
food, clothing, medical or dental care, or shelter] as a result of neglect, refusal, or inability.
“Neglect” means a failure to provide which is neither intentional nor due to parental
incapacity but rather is due to an inattentive state of mind.
“Refusal” is a willful and intentional failure to provide.
“Inability” means an incapacity on the part of the parent to perceive or to respond
adequately to the needs of the child, but does not include an incapacity which is solely the
result of poverty.4
[“Necessary care” means that care which is vital to the needs and the physical health
of the child. Parents have the right and duty to protect, train, and discipline their children
and supervise their activities. In determining what constitutes necessary care, you may
consider all of the facts and circumstances bearing on the child’s need for care, including
his or her age, physical condition, and special needs.]
The second element requires that the failure to provide [care, food, clothing, medical
or dental care, or shelter] seriously endangered the (child)’s physical health.
“Physical health” refers to bodily health and safety and does not include the mental or
emotional health of the child. The physical health of the child is “seriously endangered” if
the failure to provide creates a significant risk that the child will be seriously harmed or
injured. However, actual harm or injury need not have occurred. In determining whether
the physical health of the child was seriously endangered, you may consider the natural
and probable consequences of the failure to provide. You may also consider the nature of
any possible harm to the child and the level of risk that a particular harm will occur.
SPECIAL VERDICT
1. Did (parent) neglect, refuse or was (he) (she) unable for reasons other than poverty
to provide necessary [care, food, clothing, medical or dental care, or shelter] for
(child) so as to seriously endanger (child)’s physical health?
Answer:__________________
Yes or No
History
Wis JI-Children 250 (2/2025). Release No. 4. Wisconsin Court System, 2/2025. Prepared by the Wisconsin Jury Instructions Committees of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.
Provenance
- Source
- wilawlibrary.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
0ab045ebe5ba07ffb6021025744f9858b6888e456ac2844f47d78373055efecf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.