Bindinglaw

WI · jury_instructions

Wis JI-Children 218B

Abuse by Sexual Exploitation: Violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.05(2)

activein force · 2010-01-01 – presentas-observed

The petition in this case alleges that (child) has been the victim of abuse. Your role as

jurors will be to answer the following question in the special verdict:

1. Was (child) the victim of abuse?

The burden is on (petitioner) to convince you by evidence that is clear, satisfactory,

and convincing, to a reasonable certainty, that the question should be answered "yes."

In this case, "abuse" means sexual exploitation. Sexual exploitation of a child occurs

when a (parent) (person responsible for the child's welfare) permits, allows, or encourages

the child to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of (insert purpose from Wis.

Stat. § 948.05(1)(a),(b), or (c)).

The burden is on (petitioner) to establish that the following three elements were

present:

First, that (parent) (person responsible for (child)'s welfare) permitted, allowed, or

encouraged (child) to engage in sexually explicit conduct.

Second, the purpose for permitting, allowing, or encouraging (child) was to record or

display in any way sexually explicit conduct involving the child.

Third, that (child) had not attained the age of 18 years. 1

"Sexually explicit conduct" means actual or simulated (sexual intercourse) (bestiality)

(masturbation) (sexual sadism or sexual masochistic abuse) (lewd exhibition of intimate

parts). [Emission of semen is not required.]

(Petitioner) is not required to prove that an alleged abuser had knowledge of (child)'s

age, and any mistake regarding (child)'s age is not a defense. 2 Similarly, consent is not an

issue, and any consent by (child) is not a defense.

While the burden is on (petitioner) to establish that abuse occurred, (petitioner) need

not prove who caused the abuse.

If you are convinced by evidence that is clear, satisfactory, and convincing, to a

reasonable certainty, that (child) was the victim of abuse, you should answer the question in

the special verdict "yes." If you are not so convinced, you must answer the question "no."

SPECIAL VERDICT

1. Was (child) the victim of abuse?

Answer:__________________

Yes or No

History

Wis JI-Children 218B (2010). ©2010, Regents, Univ. of Wis. Prepared by the Wisconsin Jury Instructions Committees of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference with the University of Wisconsin Law School; posted by the Wisconsin State Law Library with the University's permission.

Provenance

Source
wilawlibrary.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
2f2c67056866d00b975e3b5c2ed0ff203e050b1a1e1bcae65d1c7c3284146dfc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wis JI-Children 218B — Abuse by Sexual Exploitation:… · binding.law