WA · rules
Wash. R. Prof'l Conduct 8.1
Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters
An applicant for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with an application for
reinstatement or admission to the Bar or a disciplinary matter involving a legal practitioner, shall
not:
(a) knowingly make a false statement of material fact; or
(b) fail to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to
have arisen in the matter, or knowingly fail to respond to a lawful demand for information from
an admissions or disciplinary authority, except that this Rule does not require disclosure of
information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6.
History
[Adopted effective September 1, 1985; Amended effective October 1, 2002; September 1, 2006; April 14, 2015; June 4, 2019.] Comment [1] The duty imposed by this Rule extends to persons seeking admission to the bar as well as to lawyers. Hence, if a person makes a material false statement in connection with an application for admission, it may be the basis for subsequent disciplinary action if the person is admitted, and in any event may be relevant in subsequent admission application. The duty imposed by this Rule applies to a lawyer’s own admission or discipline as well as that of others. Thus, it is a separate professional offense for a lawyer to knowingly make a misrepresentation or omission in connection with a disciplinary investigation of the lawyer’s own conduct. Paragraph (b) of this Rule also requires correction of any prior misstatement in the matter that the applicant or lawyer may have made and affirmative clarification of any misunderstanding on the part of the admissions or disciplinary authority of which the person involved becomes aware. [2] This Rule is subject to the provisions of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and corresponding provisions of state constitutions. A person relying on such a provision in response to a question, however, should do so openly and not use the right of nondisclosure as a justification for failure to comply with this Rule. [3] [Washington revision] A lawyer representing an applicant for admission to the bar, representing a lawyer who is the subject of a disciplinary inquiry or proceeding, or representing an LLLT in relation to an application for limited licensure under APR 28 or disciplinary matter is governed by the rules applicable to the client-lawyer relationship, including Rule 1.6 and, in some cases, Rule 3.3. [Comment 3 amended effective April 14, 2015.] Additional Washington Comment (4-5) [4] A lawyer’s obligations under this Rule are in addition to the lawyer’s obligations under the Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct. [5] The corollary duties of applicants for limited licensure under APR 28 are set forth in LLLT RPC 8.1. [Comment 5 adopted effective April 14, 2015.] [Comments adopted effective September 1, 2006.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
688c26457e3471d2a504455ee2216e1a8e78227cf813ba7a09a27659aee177b3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.