Bindinglaw

WA · rules

Wash. R. App. P. Form 4

Statement of Grounds for Direct Review

activein force · 2023-06-27 – presentact-effective-date

(Rule 4.2(b))

No. (Supreme Court)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

[Title of the trial court )

proceeding with )

parties designated )

as in rule 3.4] )

STATEMENT OF

GROUNDS FOR DIRECT

REVIEW BY THE

SUPREME COURT

(Name of party ) seeks direct review of the ( describe the

decision or part of the decision t hat the party wants reviewed)

entered by the ( name of court) on ( date of entry.) The issues

presented in the review are: [State issues presented for review.

See Part II of Form 6 for suggestions for framing issues

presented for review.]

The reasons for granting direct review are: (Briefly

indicate and argue grounds for direct review. See rule 4.2.)

[If the petition is prepared using word processing

software, include the following statement: This document

contains words, excluding the parts of the document

exempted from the word count by RAP 18.17.]

[Date]

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________________

Signature

(Name, personal pronouns (optional), address, telephone

number, and Washington State Bar Association

membership number of attorney)

History

[Adopted effective July 1, 1976; Amended effective September 1, 1994; September 1, 2006; September 1, 2010; September 1, 2021; June 27, 2023.]

Provenance

Source
www.courts.wa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
19e383f86db954b859fefd2622a4de04315e428a5f54f012045669483f547db9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wash. R. App. P. Form 4 — Statement of Grounds for Di… · binding.law