WA · rules
Wash. R. App. P. Form 11
Objections to Cost Bill
(Rule 14.5)
No. (appellate court)
(SUPREME COURT or COURT OF APPEALS,
DIVISION_____)
OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
(Title of trial court proceeding )
with parties designated as in ) OBJECTIONS TO COST
BILL )
rule 3.4) )
(Name of party objecting), (appellant, petitioner or
respondent), objects to the award of any costs to (name of
party) because:
(Here state reasons. See rule 14.2.)
Alternate Form
(Name of party objecting), (appellant, petitioner, or
respondent), objects to the following expenses listed on the
Cost Bill of (name of party):
(List the items on the cost bill which are objectionable,
by number of item on the cost bill with a description of the item
and the amount claimed. State the objection after each item. For
example:
2. Report of Proceedings $320.00
Objection: The amount claimed is unreasonable. See RAP 14.3.
(a). The report of proceedings is double spaced and is ____
pages. The usual charge per page is $____. Computed on the
usual basis, the total charge should be $220.00.
5. Bond $10.00
Objection: The charge is for the premium on a cost bond. A
cost bond is not required under the new rules. The charge was
not reasonably necessary for review. See RAP 14.3(a).)
(Date)
_____________________________________
Signature
Attorney for (Appellant, Respondent,
or Petitioner) (Name, personal pronouns (optional),
address, telephone number, and Washington State Bar
Association membership number of attorney)
History
[Adopted effective July 1, 1976; Amended effective September 1, 1994; June 27, 2023.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
83dfd53308d799cff2bcbab2cda55c9c95f7289f67b755a51651d30c03170ae6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.