Bindinglaw

WA · rules

Wash. R. App. P. 18.9

Violation of Rules

activein force · 2022-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Sanctions. The appellate court on its own initiative or on motion of a party may order a

party or counsel, or a court reporter or authorized transcriptionist preparing a verbatim report of

proceedings, who uses these rules for the purpose of delay, files a frivolous appeal, or fails to

comply with these rules to pay terms or compensatory damages to any other party who has been

harmed by the delay or the failure to comply or to pay sanctions to the court. The appellate court

may condition a party's right to participate further in the review on compliance with terms of an

order or ruling including payment of an award which is ordered paid by the party. If an award is

not paid within the time specified by the court, the appellate court will transmit the award to the

superior court of the county where the case arose and direct the entry of a judgment in

accordance with the award.

(b) Dismissal on Motion of Commissioner or Clerk. The commissioner or clerk, on 10

days' notice to the parties, (1) may dismiss a review proceeding as provided in section (a), (2)

may dismiss a review proceeding for want of prosecution if the party seeking review has

abandoned the review, and (3) except as provided in rule 18.8(b), will dismiss a review

proceeding for failure to timely file a notice of appeal, a notice for discretionary review, a motion

for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, or a petition for review. A party

may object to the ruling of the commissioner or clerk only as provided in rule 17.7.

(c) Dismissal on Motion of Party. The appellate court will, on motion of a party, dismiss

review of a case (1) for want of prosecution if the party seeking review has abandoned the

review, or (2) if the application for review is frivolous, moot, or solely for the purpose of delay,

or (3) except as provided in rule 18.8(b), for failure to timely file a notice of appeal, a notice of

discretionary review, a motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, or

a petition for review.

(d) Objection to Ruling. A counsel upon whom sanctions have been imposed or a party

may object to the ruling of a commissioner or the clerk only as provided in rule 17.7.

References

Rule 10.7, Submission of Improper Brief.

History

[Adopted effective July 1, 1976; Amended effective September 1, 1990; September 1, 1994; September 1, 1998; September 1, 2015; September 1, 2022.]

Provenance

Source
www.courts.wa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
92bcdb0b9a5d00f2e250ba00ecf839139417778f0feb4cb6cc2079cd247ddc1f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wash. R. App. P. 18.9 — Violation of Rules · binding.law