WA · rules
Wash. R. App. P. 15.2
Determination of Indigency and Rights of Indigent Party
CURRENTNESS
(a) Motion for Order of Indigency. A party seeking review in the Court of Appeals or
the Supreme Court partially or wholly at public expense must move in the trial court for an order
of indigency. The party shall submit a Motion for Order of Indigency, in the form prescribed by
the Office of Public Defense.
(b) Action by the Trial Court. The trial court shall determine the indigency, if any, of the
party seeking review at public expense. The determination shall be made in written findings
after a hearing, if circumstances warrant, or by reevaluating any order of indigency previously
entered by the trial court. The court:
(1) shall grant the motion for an order of indigency if the party seeking public funds is
unable by reason of poverty to pay for all or some of the expenses for appellate review of:
(A) criminal prosecutions or juvenile offense proceedings meeting the requirements of
RCW 10.73.150.
(B) dependency and termination cases under RCW 13.34,
(C) commitment proceedings under chapters 71.05 and 71.09 RCW,
(D) civil contempt cases directing incarceration of the contemner,
(E) orders denying petitions for writ of habeas corpus under chapter 7.36 RCW, including
attorneys' fees upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and
(F) any other case in which the party has a constitutional or statutory right to counsel at all
stages of the proceedings; or
(2) shall deny the motion for an order of indigency if a party has adequate means to pay all
of the expenses of review or if the case is not one of the case types listed in subsection (b)(1). If
the motion was denied because the party has adequate means to pay, the order denying the
motion for an order of indigency shall contain findings designating the funds or source of funds
available to the party to pay all of the expenses of review.
(c) Order of Indigency. An order of indigency shall designate the items of expense that
are to be paid with public funds and, where appropriate, the items of expense to be paid by a
party or the amount that the party must contribute toward the expense of review. The order shall
designate the extent to which public funds are to be used for payment of the expense of the
record on review, limited to those parts of the record reasonably necessary to review issues
argued in good faith. The order of indigency must be transmitted to the appellate court as a part
of the record on review.
(d) Continued Indigency Presumed. A party and counsel for the party who has been
granted an order of indigency must bring to the attention of the appellate court any significant
improvement during review in the financial condition of the party. The appellate court will give
a party the benefits of an order of indigency throughout the review unless the appellate court
finds the party's financial condition has improved to the extent that the party is no longer
indigent.
(e) Appointment and Withdrawal of Counsel in Appellate Court. The appellate court
shall determine questions relating to the appointment and withdrawal of counsel for an indigent
party on review. The Office of Public Defense shall, in accordance with its indigent appellate
representation policies, provide the names of indigent appellate counsel to the appellate courts on
a case-by-case basis. If trial counsel is not appointed, trial counsel must assist counsel appointed
for review in preparing the record.
(f) Review of Order of Indigency. A party in a case of a type listed in subsection (b)(1) of
this rule may seek review of an order of indigency or an order denying an order of indigency
entered by a trial court. A party may object to an indigency decision of the trial court by motion
in appellate court.
(g) Withdrawal of Counsel in Appellate Court. If counsel can find no basis for a good
faith argument on review, counsel should file a motion in the appellate court to withdraw as
counsel for the indigent as provided in rule 18.3(a).
References
Form 12, Order of Indegency; Rule 2.3, Decisions of the Trial Court Which May Be
Reviewed by Discretionary Review.
History
[Adopted effective July 1, 1976; Amended effective July 2, 1976; July 1, 1978; January 1, 1980; September 1, 1994; June 1, 1999; December 28, 1999; December 24, 2002; September 9, 2004 July 1, 2005; January 3, 2006; September 1, 2010; January 31, 2017; September 1, 2017; September 1, 2018; May 2, 2023.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
919933140dcec51f92e862d40eda5ae6ad2d3c17a5d371e7955633cd780ac679
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.