WA · rules
Wash. R. App. P. 13.4
Discretionary Review of Decision Terminating Review
(a) How to Seek Review. A party seeking discretionary review by the Supreme Court of
a Court of Appeals decision terminating review must serve on all other parties and file a
petition for review or an answer to the petition that raises new issues. A petition for review
should be filed in the Court of Appeals. If no motion to publish or motion to reconsider all or
part of the Court of Appeals decision is timely made, a petition for review must be filed within
30 days after the decision is filed. If such a motion is made, the petition for review must be
filed within 30 days after an order is filed denying a timely motion for reconsideration or
determining a timely motion to publish. If the petition for review is filed prior to the Court of
Appeals determination on the motion to reconsider or on a motion to publish, the petition will
not be forwarded to the Supreme Court until the Court of Appeals files an order on all such
motions. The first party to file a petition for review must, at the time the petition is filed, pay
the statutory filing fee to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in which the petition is filed.
Failure to serve a party with the petition for review or file proof of service does not prejudice
the rights of the party seeking review, but may subject the party to a motion by the Clerk of the
Supreme Court to dismiss the petition for review if not cured in a timely manner. A party
prejudiced by the failure to serve the petition for review or to file proof of service may move in
the Supreme Court for appropriate relief.
(b) Considerations Governing Acceptance of Review. A petition for review will be
accepted by the Supreme Court only: (1) If the decision of the Court of Appeals is in conflict
with a decision of the Supreme Court; or (2) If the decision of the Court of Appeals is in
conflict with a published decision of the Court of Appeals; or (3) If a significant question of
law under the Constitution of the State of Washington or of the United States is involved; or
(4) If the petition involves an issue of substantial public interest that should be determined by
the Supreme Court.
(c) Content and Style of Petition. The petition for review should contain under
appropriate headings and in the order here indicated:
(1) Cover. A title page, which is the cover.
(2) Tables. A table of contents, with page references, and a table of cases (alphabetically
arranged), statutes, and other authorities cited, with reference to the pages of the brief where
cited.
(3) Identity of Petitioner. A statement of the name and designation of the person filing
the petition.
(4) Citation to Court of Appeals Decision. A reference to the Court of Appeals decision
which petitioner wants reviewed, the date of filing the decision, and the date of any order
granting or denying a motion for reconsideration.
(5) Issues Presented for Review. A concise statement of the issues presented for review.
(6) Statement of the Case. A statement of the facts and procedures relevant to the issues
presented for review, with appropriate references to the record.
(7) Argument. A direct and concise statement of the reason why review should be
accepted under one or more of the tests established in section (b), with argument.
(8) Conclusion. A short conclusion stating the precise relief sought.
(9) Appendix. An appendix containing a copy of the Court of Appeals decision, any
order granting or denying a motion for reconsideration of the decision, and copies of statutes
and constitutional provisions relevant to the issues presented for review.
(d) Answer and Reply. A party may file an answer to a petition for review. A party
filing an answer to a petition for review must serve the answer on all other parties. If the party
wants to seek review of any issue that is not raised in the petition for review, including any
issues that were raised but not decided in the Court of Appeals, the party must raise those new
issues in an answer. Any answer should be filed within 30 days after the service on the party of
the petition. A party may file a reply to an answer only if the answering party seeks review of
issues not raised in the petition for review. A reply to an answer should be limited to
addressing only the new issues raised in the answer. A party filing any reply to an answer
must serve the reply to the answer on all other parties. A reply to an answer should be filed
within 15 days after the service on the party of the answer. An answer or reply should be filed
in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may call for an answer or a reply to an answer.
(e) Form of Petition, Answer, and Reply. The petition, answer, and reply should
comply with the requirements as to form for a brief as provided in rules 10.3, 10.4, and 18.17,
except as otherwise provided in this rule.
(f) Length. The petition for review, answer, or reply should comply with the length
limitations of RAP 18.17.
(g) Reproduction of Petition, Answer, and Reply. The clerk will arrange for the
reproduction of copies of a petition for review, an answer, or a reply, and bill the appropriate
party for the copies as provided in rule 10.5.
(h) Amicus Curiae Memoranda. The Supreme Court may grant permission to file an
amicus curiae memorandum in support of or opposition to a pending petition for review.
Absent a showing of particular justification, an amicus curiae memorandum should be
received by the court and counsel of record for the parties and other amicus curiae not later
than 60 days from the date the petition for review is filed. Rules 10.4 and 10.6 should govern
generally disposition of a motion to file an amicus curiae memorandum. An amicus curiae
memorandum or answer thereto should comply with the length limitations of RAP 18.17.
(i) No Oral Argument. The Supreme Court will decide the petition without oral
argument.
References
Form 9, Petition for review.
History
[Adopted effective July 1, 1976; Amended effective September 1, 1983; September 1, 1990; September 18, 1992; September 1, 1994; September 1, 1998; September 1, 1999; December 24, 2002; September 1, 2006; September 1, 2009; September 1, 2010; December 8, 2015; September 1, 2016; September 1, 2021.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
19fd96f7d9aa8b3991022765e5ce37e5cad32dd5415e48d34d6e0c1f288664f6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.