Bindinglaw

WA · rules

Wash. R. App. P. 13.4

Discretionary Review of Decision Terminating Review

activein force · 2021-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) How to Seek Review. A party seeking discretionary review by the Supreme Court of

a Court of Appeals decision terminating review must serve on all other parties and file a

petition for review or an answer to the petition that raises new issues. A petition for review

should be filed in the Court of Appeals. If no motion to publish or motion to reconsider all or

part of the Court of Appeals decision is timely made, a petition for review must be filed within

30 days after the decision is filed. If such a motion is made, the petition for review must be

filed within 30 days after an order is filed denying a timely motion for reconsideration or

determining a timely motion to publish. If the petition for review is filed prior to the Court of

Appeals determination on the motion to reconsider or on a motion to publish, the petition will

not be forwarded to the Supreme Court until the Court of Appeals files an order on all such

motions. The first party to file a petition for review must, at the time the petition is filed, pay

the statutory filing fee to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in which the petition is filed.

Failure to serve a party with the petition for review or file proof of service does not prejudice

the rights of the party seeking review, but may subject the party to a motion by the Clerk of the

Supreme Court to dismiss the petition for review if not cured in a timely manner. A party

prejudiced by the failure to serve the petition for review or to file proof of service may move in

the Supreme Court for appropriate relief.

(b) Considerations Governing Acceptance of Review. A petition for review will be

accepted by the Supreme Court only: (1) If the decision of the Court of Appeals is in conflict

with a decision of the Supreme Court; or (2) If the decision of the Court of Appeals is in

conflict with a published decision of the Court of Appeals; or (3) If a significant question of

law under the Constitution of the State of Washington or of the United States is involved; or

(4) If the petition involves an issue of substantial public interest that should be determined by

the Supreme Court.

(c) Content and Style of Petition. The petition for review should contain under

appropriate headings and in the order here indicated:

(1) Cover. A title page, which is the cover.

(2) Tables. A table of contents, with page references, and a table of cases (alphabetically

arranged), statutes, and other authorities cited, with reference to the pages of the brief where

cited.

(3) Identity of Petitioner. A statement of the name and designation of the person filing

the petition.

(4) Citation to Court of Appeals Decision. A reference to the Court of Appeals decision

which petitioner wants reviewed, the date of filing the decision, and the date of any order

granting or denying a motion for reconsideration.

(5) Issues Presented for Review. A concise statement of the issues presented for review.

(6) Statement of the Case. A statement of the facts and procedures relevant to the issues

presented for review, with appropriate references to the record.

(7) Argument. A direct and concise statement of the reason why review should be

accepted under one or more of the tests established in section (b), with argument.

(8) Conclusion. A short conclusion stating the precise relief sought.

(9) Appendix. An appendix containing a copy of the Court of Appeals decision, any

order granting or denying a motion for reconsideration of the decision, and copies of statutes

and constitutional provisions relevant to the issues presented for review.

(d) Answer and Reply. A party may file an answer to a petition for review. A party

filing an answer to a petition for review must serve the answer on all other parties. If the party

wants to seek review of any issue that is not raised in the petition for review, including any

issues that were raised but not decided in the Court of Appeals, the party must raise those new

issues in an answer. Any answer should be filed within 30 days after the service on the party of

the petition. A party may file a reply to an answer only if the answering party seeks review of

issues not raised in the petition for review. A reply to an answer should be limited to

addressing only the new issues raised in the answer. A party filing any reply to an answer

must serve the reply to the answer on all other parties. A reply to an answer should be filed

within 15 days after the service on the party of the answer. An answer or reply should be filed

in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may call for an answer or a reply to an answer.

(e) Form of Petition, Answer, and Reply. The petition, answer, and reply should

comply with the requirements as to form for a brief as provided in rules 10.3, 10.4, and 18.17,

except as otherwise provided in this rule.

(f) Length. The petition for review, answer, or reply should comply with the length

limitations of RAP 18.17.

(g) Reproduction of Petition, Answer, and Reply. The clerk will arrange for the

reproduction of copies of a petition for review, an answer, or a reply, and bill the appropriate

party for the copies as provided in rule 10.5.

(h) Amicus Curiae Memoranda. The Supreme Court may grant permission to file an

amicus curiae memorandum in support of or opposition to a pending petition for review.

Absent a showing of particular justification, an amicus curiae memorandum should be

received by the court and counsel of record for the parties and other amicus curiae not later

than 60 days from the date the petition for review is filed. Rules 10.4 and 10.6 should govern

generally disposition of a motion to file an amicus curiae memorandum. An amicus curiae

memorandum or answer thereto should comply with the length limitations of RAP 18.17.

(i) No Oral Argument. The Supreme Court will decide the petition without oral

argument.

References

Form 9, Petition for review.

History

[Adopted effective July 1, 1976; Amended effective September 1, 1983; September 1, 1990; September 18, 1992; September 1, 1994; September 1, 1998; September 1, 1999; December 24, 2002; September 1, 2006; September 1, 2009; September 1, 2010; December 8, 2015; September 1, 2016; September 1, 2021.]

Provenance

Source
www.courts.wa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
19fd96f7d9aa8b3991022765e5ce37e5cad32dd5415e48d34d6e0c1f288664f6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wash. R. App. P. 13.4 — Discretionary Review of Decis… · binding.law