WA · rules
Wash. R. App. P. 10.10
Statement of Additional Grounds for Review
(a) Statement Permitted. In a criminal case on direct appeal, the defendant may file a pro
se statement of additional grounds for review to identify and discuss those matters related to the
decision under review that the defendant believes have not been adequately addressed by the
brief filed by the defendant’s counsel.
(b) Length and Legibility. The statement may be submitted in handwriting so long as it is
legible and can be reproduced by the clerk. The statement should comply with the formatting
requirements and length limitations of RAP 18.17.
(c) Citations; Identification of Errors. Reference to the record and citation to authorities
are not necessary or required, but the appellate court will not consider a defendant’s statement of
additional grounds for review if it does not inform the court of the nature and occurrence of
alleged errors. Except as required in cases in which counsel files a motion to withdraw as set
forth in RAP 18.3(a)(2), the appellate court is not obligated to search the record in support of
claims made in a defendant’s statement of additional grounds for review. Only documents that
are contained in the record on review should be attached or referred to in the statement.
(d) Time for Filing. The statement of additional grounds for review should be filed within
35 days after the filing of the brief filed by the defendant’s counsel. The defendant’s counsel is
responsible for promptly advising the defendant of the substance of this rule when they provide
the defendant a copy of the brief being filed by counsel. The clerk will advise all parties if the
defendant files a statement of additional grounds for review.
(e) Report of Proceedings. If within 30 days after the mailing of the notice referenced in
subsection (d) above, defendant requests a copy of the verbatim report of proceedings from
defendant’s counsel, counsel should promptly mail a copy of the verbatim report of proceedings
to the defendant and should file in the appellate court a certificate of mailing, which need not
state the address the report of proceedings was mailed to. The pro se statement of additional
grounds for review should then be filed within 35 days after the certificate of mailing is filed.
The cost for producing and mailing the verbatim report of proceedings for an indigent defendant
will be reimbursed to counsel from the Office of Public Defense in accordance with Title 15 of
these rules.
(f) Additional Briefing. The appellate court may, in the exercise of its discretion, request
additional briefing from counsel to address issues raised in the defendant’s pro se statement.
History
[Adopted effective December 24, 2002; Amended effective September 1, 2014; September 1, 2021; September 1, 2022; July 9, 2024.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
da26477930e749339835012c6822ce2a8942f1ca04d7cfac34bc6fb062af35d6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.