WA · rules
Wash. Gen. R. 11.1
Purpose and Scope of Interpreter Commission
(a) Purpose and Scope. This rule establishes the Interpreter and Language Access
Commission (Commission) and prescribes the conditions of its activities. This rule does not
modify or duplicate the statutory process directing the Court Interpreter Program as it is
administered by the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) (chapter 2.43 RCW). The
Commission will develop policies for the Interpreter Program and the Program Policy Manual,
published on the Washington Court's website at www.courts.wa.gov, which shall constitute the
official version of policies governing the Court Interpreter Program. The Commission shall
establish and promulgate guidelines on interpreting, translation, and language access matters
affecting individuals who are Limited-English-proficient or who use a signed language.
(b) Jurisdiction and Powers. Every interpreter serving in a legal proceeding must comply
with GR 11.2, the Code of Professional Responsibility for Judiciary Interpreters, and is subject to
the rules and regulations specified in the Court Interpreter Disciplinary Policy Manual. The
Commission shall establish four committees to fulfill ongoing functions related to language
access issues, discipline, and judicial/court administration education. Each committee shall
consist of at least three Commission members and one member shall be identified as the chair.
(1) The Issues Committee is assigned issues, complaints, and/or requests from or about
interpreters and interpreting for review and response. If the situation cannot be resolved at the
Issues Committee level, the matter will be submitted by written referral to the Disciplinary
Committee.
The Issues Committee will also address issues, complaints, and/or requests regarding
access to interpreter services in the courts and may communicate with individual courts in an
effort to assist in complying with language access directives required by law.
(2) The Disciplinary Committee may sanction any interpreter serving in a legal proceeding
for a violation of GR 11.2, the Code of Professional Responsibility for Judiciary Interpreters,
and has the authority to decertify or deny credentials to interpreters based on the disciplinary
procedures for: (a) violations of continuing education/court hour requirements, (b) failure to
comply with Code of Professional Responsibility for Judiciary Interpreters (GR 11.2) or
professional standards, or (c) violations of law that may interfere with their duties as an
interpreter in a legal proceeding. The Disciplinary Committee will decide on appeal any issues
submitted by the Issues Committee.
(3) The Judicial and Court Administration Education Committee shall provide ongoing
opportunities for training and resources to judicial officers, court administrators, and court staff
related to court interpretation improvement.
(4) The Translation Committee shall provide guidelines to courts on matters that involve
written documents of a legal nature or that are related to accessing the court through textual
means, whether digital or otherwise.
(c) Establishment. The Supreme Court shall appoint no more than 20 members to the
Commission and shall designate the chair and cochair of the Commission. The Commission shall
include representatives from the following areas of expertise: judicial officers from the appellate
and each trial court level (3), spoken language interpreter (2), sign language interpreter (1),
certified Deaf interpreter representative (1), court administrator (1), attorney (1), public member
(2), representative from ethnic organization (1), an AOC representative (1), Deaf community
representative (1), translator or translation services representative (1) who shall hold a certified
interpreting credential from the AOC and be practicing professional translator, and other
representatives as needed. The term for a member of the Commission shall be three years.
Members are eligible to serve a subsequent 3-year term. Members shall serve on at least one
committee and committees may be supplemented by ad hoc professionals as designated by the
chair. Ad hoc members may not serve as the chair of a committee.
(d) Regulations. Policies outlining rules and regulations directing the interpreter program
are specified in the Interpreter Program Manual. The Commission, through the Issues Committee
and Disciplinary Committee, shall enforce the policies of the interpreter program. Interpreter
program policies may be modified at any time by the Commission and AOC.
(e) Existing Law Unchanged. This rule shall not expand, narrow, or otherwise affect
existing law, including but not limited to chapter 2.43 RCW.
(f) Meetings. The Commission shall hold meetings as determined necessary by the chair.
Meetings of the Commission are open to the public except for executive sessions and
disciplinary meetings related to action against an interpreter.
(g) Immunity from Liability. No cause of action against the Commission, its standing
members or ad hoc members appointed by the Commission, shall accrue in favor of a court
interpreter or any other person arising from any act taken pursuant to this rule, provided that the
Commission members or ad hoc members acted in good faith. The burden of proving that the
acts were not taken in good faith shall be on the party asserting it.
History
[Adopted effective September 1, 2005; Amended effective April 26, 2016; December 18, 2018; September 1, 2022.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
7df53b3423fb763a7f9255091f6c3dac203e9249de12d314582cb20f22807b13
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.