WA · rules
Wash. R. Evid. 901
Requirement of Authentication or Identification
(a) General Provision. The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition
precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in
question is what its proponent claims.
(b) Illustrations. By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following
are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this rule:
(1) Testimony of Witness With Knowledge. Testimony that a matter is what it is claimed to
be.
(2) Nonexpert Opinion on Handwriting. Nonexpert opinion as to the genuineness of
handwriting, based upon familiarity not acquired for purposes of the litigation.
(3) Comparison by Court or Expert Witness. Comparison by the court or by expert
witnesses with specimens which have been authenticated.
(4) Distinctive Characteristics and the Like. Appearance, contents, substance, internal
patterns, or other distinctive characteristics, taken in conjunction with circumstances.
(5) Voice Identification. Identification of a voice, whether heard firsthand or through
mechanical or electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the voice at
any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker.
(6) Telephone Conversations. Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made
to the number assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or business, if
(i) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self-identification, show the person
answering to be the one called, or (ii) in the case of a business, the call was made to a place of
business and the conversation related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.
(7) Public Records or Reports. [Reserved. See RCW 5.44 and CR 44.]
(8) Ancient Documents or Data Compilation. Evidence that a document or data
compilation, in any form, (i) is in such condition as to create no suspicion concerning its
authenticity, (ii) was in a place where it, if authentic, would likely be, and (iii) has been in
existence 20 years or more at the time it is offered.
(9) Process or System. Evidence describing a process or system used to produce a result
and showing that the process or system produces an accurate result.
(10) Electronic Mail (E-mail). Testimony by a person with knowledge that (i) the e-mail
purports to be authored or created by the particular sender or the sender’s agent; (ii) the e-mail
purports to be sent from an e-mail address associated with the particular sender or the sender’s
agent; and (iii) the appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive
characteristics of the e-mail, taken in conjunction with the circumstances, are sufficient to
support a finding that the e-mail in question is what the proponent claims.
(11) Methods Provided by Statute or Rule. Any method of authentication or identification
provided by statute or court rule.
History
[Adopted effective April 2, 1979; Amended effective December 10, 2013.] Comment 901 [Deleted effective September 1, 2006.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
562e5c2af51e1fa36f64f86968ea3b620fa9b3f6449df734752d9ae3cbf24cdd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.