WA · rules
Wash. R. Evid. 407
Subsequent Remedial Measures
When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the
event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove
negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event. This rule does not require the
exclusion of evidence of subsequent measures when offered for another purpose, such as proving
ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures, if controverted, or impeachment.
History
[Adopted effective April 2, 1979.] Comment 407 [Deleted effective September 1, 2006.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
74eb1af2196b00bb216b43de57f91d3f7671d277c4bafd819827c61cae815f87
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.