WA · rules
Wash. R. for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct 2.7
Conflicts Review Officer
(a) Function. Conflicts Review Officers review grievances filed against disciplinary
counsel and other lawyers employed by the Association, hearing officers, conflicts review
officers and conflicts review officers pro tempore, members of the Disciplinary Board, officers
and members of the Board of Governors, and staff, attorneys, and judicial officers of the
Supreme Court. Conflicts Review Officers also review grievances filed against persons who
have been assigned cases as adjunct disciplinary or special disciplinary counsel, or appointed in
disability matters pursuant to ELC 8.2(c)(2), at the time the grievance is filed. A Conflicts
Review Officer performs other functions as set forth in these rules.
(1) Authority. The Conflicts Review Officer’s duties are limited to performing the initial
review of grievances covered by this Rule. A Conflicts Review Officer may, under rule 5.3(b),
obtain the respondent lawyer’s response to the grievance, if they feel it is necessary to do so, in
their sole discretion. A Conflicts Review Officer may dismiss the grievance under rule 5.7(a),
defer the investigation under rule 5.3(d), or assign the grievance to special disciplinary counsel
for investigation under rules 2.8(b) and 5.3. If a grievant requests review of a dismissal under
rule 5.7(b), the Conflicts Review Officer may either reopen the matter for investigation or refer it
to a review committee under that rule.
(2) Independence. Conflicts Review Officers act independently of disciplinary counsel and
the Association.
(b) Appointment and Qualifications.
(1) The Supreme Court, on the recommendation of the Board of Governors in consultation
with the Disciplinary Selection Panel, shall appoint three active members of the Association as
Conflicts Review Officers. Each Conflicts Review Officer is appointed for a three-year term on
a staggered basis, and may be recommended for reappointment at the discretion of the Board of
Governors. Applications shall be solicited from those eligible to serve, and submitted to the
Board of Governors, in such manner as the Association deems most appropriate under the
policies and procedures then in effect for recruitment and appointment of volunteers in the
discipline system.
(2) When no Conflicts Review Officer is available to handle a matter due to conflict of
interest or other good cause, the Supreme Court, on the recommendation of the Board of
Governors, shall appoint a Conflicts Review Officer pro tempore for the matter.
(3) To be eligible for appointment as Conflicts Review Officer or Conflicts Review Officer
pro tempore, a lawyer must have prior experience as a Disciplinary Board member, disciplinary
counsel, or special disciplinary counsel. Conflicts Review Officers and Conflicts Review
Officers pro tempore may have no other active role in the discipline system during the term of
appointment.
(c) Counsel and Clerk; Assignment of Cases. The Association shall assign matters to the
Conflicts Review Officers in such a manner as to balance their caseloads insofar as it is
practicable to do so. The Executive Director of the Association may appoint a suitable person or
persons to act as counsel and clerk to the Conflicts Review Officers, to assist them in carrying
out their functions under these rules.
(d) Access to Disciplinary Information. Conflicts Review Officers and Conflicts Review
Officers pro tempore have access to any otherwise confidential disciplinary information
necessary to perform the duties required by these rules. Conflicts Review Officers and Conflicts
Review Officers pro tempore shall return original files to the Association promptly upon
completion of the duties required by these rules and shall not retain copies.
(e) Compensation and Expenses. The Association reimburses Conflicts Review Officers
and Conflicts Review Officers pro tempore for all necessary and reasonable expenses, and may
provide compensation at a level established by the Board of Governors.
(f) Restriction on Representing or Advising Respondents or Grievants. Current
Conflicts Review Officers are subject to the restrictions set forth in rule 2.14. Members serving
as Conflicts Review Officer pro tempore are subject to the same restriction while serving in that
capacity.
History
[Adopted effective October 1, 2002; Amended effective January 12, 2010; January 1, 2014; January 1, 2015; September 1, 2017; January 1, 2023.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
678d5f29b06d9c8f45c9db2064be8aee3d1ab7dfdc427eaeab7e18c3d0a1bfe5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.