WA · rules
Wash. R. for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct 10.2
Hearing Officer Assignment
(a) Assignment. The chief hearing officer assigns a hearing officer, from those
eligible under rule 2.5.
(b) Disqualification and Removal.
(1) Removal Without Cause. Either party is entitled to have an assigned hearing
officer removed, without establishing cause for the removal, by filing a written request
with the Clerk within ten days after service on the respondent of that officer’s
assignment. A party may only once request removal without cause in any proceeding.
(2) Disqualification for Cause. Either party may move to disqualify any assigned
hearing officer for good cause. A motion under this subsection must be filed promptly
after the party knows, or in the exercise of due diligence should have known, of the basis
for the disqualification.
(3) Notice to Chief Hearing Officer. The Clerk must promptly provide copies of
requests or motions for removal or for disqualification to the chief hearing officer.
(4) Decision. The chief hearing officer decides all requests for removal and
disqualification motions, except the Chair decides a request to remove or disqualify the
chief hearing officer. The decision of the chief hearing officer or Chair on a request for
removal or a motion to disqualify is not subject to interim review. After removal or
disqualification of the assigned hearing officer, the chief hearing officer assigns a
replacement.
History
[Adopted effective October 1, 2002; Amended effective January 1, 2014.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
faa372e0bf48b212466c8c6d74a5c7c120fd0b6fcf6c68c7764b9b5b6e8d9e8e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.