WA · rules
Wash. R. for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct 10.16
Decision of Hearing Officer
(a) Decision. Within 30 days after the proceedings are concluded or (if applicable) the
transcript of proceedings is served, the hearing officer should file with the Clerk a decision in the
form of findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. This deadline may be
extended by agreement.
(b) Preparation of Findings. Either party may submit proposed findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and recommendation. Proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation,
if any, must be submitted within 20 days after the disciplinary hearing is concluded or as
otherwise ordered by the hearing officer. The hearing officer either (1) writes findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and recommendations without requiring submission of proposed findings,
conclusions, or recommendations or (2) announces a tentative decision then requests one or both
parties to prepare proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations. After notice and an
opportunity to respond, the hearing officer considers the proposals and responses and enters
findings, conclusions, and recommendations.
(c) Amendment.
(1) Timing of Motion. Either party may move to modify, amend, or correct the decision as
follows:
(A) In a proceeding not bifurcated, within 15 days of service of the decision on the
respondent lawyer;
(B) In a bifurcated proceeding, within 15 days of service of:
(i) the violation findings of fact and conclusions of law; or
(ii) the sanction recommendation, but this motion may not seek to modify, amend, or
correct the violation findings or conclusions.
(2) Procedure. Rule 10.8 governs this motion. The hearing officer should rule on the
motion within 15 days after the filing of a timely reply or after the period to file a reply under
rule 10.8(c) has expired. The ruling may deny the motion or may amend, modify, or correct the
decision.
(3) Effect of Failure To Move. Failure to move for modification, correction, or amendment
does not affect any appeal to the Board or review by the Supreme Court.
(d) When Final. If a hearing officer recommends reprimand or an admonition, or
recommends dismissal of the charges, the recommendation becomes the final decision if neither
party files an appeal and the Chair does not refer the matter to the Board for sua sponte review
under rule 11.13(b). If the Chair refers a matter for sua sponte review under rule 11.3(b) and the
Board declines review, the hearing officer’s recommendation becomes the final decision upon
entry of the Board’s order declining review. If a hearing officer recommends disbarment or
suspension, the recommendation becomes the final decision only upon entry of an order by the
Supreme Court under rule 11.12(g) or final action on an appeal or petition for discretionary
review under Title 12.
History
[Adopted effective October 1, 2002; Amended effective January 1, 2014; January 1, 2015; September 1, 2017.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
d989435222cfc1947ed055c90a60fab2b6496357cb3208075343232c17bbafbc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.