Bindinglaw

WA · rules

Wash. Discipline R. for Judges 7

Additional Evidence or Findings--Remand

activein force · 2013-12-10 – presentact-effective-date

If the Supreme Court on its own motion or on the motion of the commission or the judge

determines that further commission proceedings, additional evidence, or additional findings will

aid the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court may remand the case to the commission or accept

supplementary materials without remand.

Comment

The Supreme Court may conclude, either on its own or at the instance of a party, that

additional commission proceedings are desirable. The Supreme Court may decide that the

commission should reconsider its decision or obtain additional evidence. This rule permits a

remand for these purposes. The rule also authorizes the Supreme Court to receive additional

evidence. The generally accepted standard of review for Supreme Court proceedings in the area

of judicial misconduct or disability is an "independent evaluation of the evidence." Hence, the

Supreme Court functions with a broader standard of review than is usual for an appellate court

reviewing a trial court decision. This rule allows maximum flexibility for supplementing the

record. Compare. ABA Standards 7.4-7.6, which are consistent with this approach.

History

[Adopted effective May 14, 1982; amended effective December 10, 2013.]

Provenance

Source
www.courts.wa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
2b84002db464619e1d4f697a1c536af0593ddf2932c3d23fbbe739091523365c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.