Bindinglaw

WA · rules

Wash. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 37

Failure To Make Discovery: Sanctions

activein force · 2015-04-28 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. A party, upon reasonable notice to other

parties and all persons affected thereby, and upon a showing of compliance with rule 26(i), may

apply to the court in the county where the deposition was taken, or in the county where the action

is pending, for an order compelling discovery as follows:

(1) Appropriate Court. An application for an order to a party may be made to the court in

which the action is pending, or on matters relating to a deposition, to the court in the county

where the deposition is being taken. An application for an order to a deponent who is not a party

shall be made to the court in the county where the deposition is being taken.

(2) Motion. If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under

rules 30 or 31, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under rule 30(b)(6)

or 31(a), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under rule 33, or if a party, in

response to a request for inspection submitted under rule 34, fails to respond that inspection will

be permitted as requested or fails to permit inspection as requested, any party may move for an

order compelling an answer or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance

with the request. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question

may complete or adjourn the examination before the proponent applies for an order.

If the court denies the motion in whole or in part, it may make such protective order as it

would have been empowered to make on a motion made pursuant to rule 26(c).

(3) Evasive or Incomplete Answer. For purposes of this section an evasive or incomplete

answer is to be treated as a failure to answer.

(4) Award of Expenses of Motion. If the motion is granted, the court shall, after opportunity

for hearing, require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or

attorney advising such conduct or both of them to pay to the moving party the reasonable

expenses incurred in obtaining the order, including attorney fees, unless the court finds that the

opposition to the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of

expenses unjust.

If the motion is denied, the court shall, after opportunity for hearing, require the moving

party or the attorney advising the motion or both of them to pay to the party or deponent who

opposed the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion, including attorney

fees, unless the court finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other

circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the court may apportion the reasonable

expenses incurred in relation to the motion among the parties and persons in a just manner.

(b) Failure To Comply With Order.

(1) Sanctions by Court in County Where Deposition Is Taken. If a deponent fails to be

sworn or to answer a question after being directed to do so by the court in the county in which the

deposition is being taken, the failure may be considered a contempt of that court.

(2) Sanctions by Court in Which Action Is Pending. If a party or an officer, director, or

managing agent of a party or a person designated under rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf

of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under

section (a) of this rule or rule 35, or if a party fails to obey an order entered under rule 26(f), the

court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and

among others the following:

(A) An order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated

facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim

of the party obtaining the order;

(B) An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims

or defenses, or prohibiting the disobedient party from introducing designated matters in evidence;

(C) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the

order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceedings or any part thereof, or rendering a

judgment by default against the disobedient party;

(D) In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order treating as a

contempt of court the failure to obey any orders except an order to submit to physical or mental

examination;

(E) Where a party has failed to comply with an order under rule 35(a) requiring the party to

produce another for examination such orders as are listed in sections (A), (B), and (C) of this

subsection, unless the party failing to comply shows that the party is unable to produce such

person for examination.

In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party

failing to obey the order or the attorney advising him or her or both to pay the reasonable

expenses, including attorney fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was

substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

(c) Expenses on Failure To Admit. If a party fails to admit the genuineness of any

document or the truth of any matter as requested under rule 36, and if the party requesting the

admissions thereafter proves the genuineness of the document or the truth of the matter, the party

may apply to the court for an order requiring the other party to pay the requesting party the

reasonable expenses incurred in making that proof, including reasonable attorney fees. The court

shall make the order unless it finds that

(1) the request was held objectionable pursuant to rule 36(a), or

(2) the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or

(3) the party failing to admit had reasonable ground to believe the fact was not true or the

document was not genuine, or

(4) there was other good reason for the failure to admit.

(d) Failure of Party To Attend at Own Deposition or Serve Answers to Interrogatories

or Respond to Request for Production or Inspection. If a party or an officer, director, or

managing agent of a party or a person designated under rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf

of a party fails

(1) to appear before the officer who is to take his or her deposition, after being served with

a proper notice, or

(2) to serve answers or objections to interrogatories submitted under rule 33, after proper

service of the interrogatories, or

(3) to serve a written response to a request for production of documents or inspection

submitted under rule 34, after proper service of the request, the court in which the action is

pending on motion may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others it

may take any action authorized under sections (A), (B), and (C) of subsection (b)(2) of this rule.

In lieu of any order or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to act or the

attorney advising the party or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees,

caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that

other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.

The failure to act described in this subsection may not be excused on the ground that the

discovery sought is objectionable unless the party failing to act has applied for a protective order

as provided by rule 26(c). For purposes of this section, an evasive or misleading answer is to be

treated as a failure to answer.

(e) Failure To Participate in the Framing of a Discovery Plan. If a party or a party’s

attorney fails to participate in good faith in the framing of a discovery plan by agreement as is

required by rule 26(f), the court may, after opportunity for hearing, require such party or such

party’s attorney to pay to any other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, caused

by the failure.

History

[Adopted effective July 1, 1967; Amended effective July 1, 1972; September 1, 1985; September 1, 1992; September 1, 1993; April 28, 2015.]

Provenance

Source
www.courts.wa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
2c07bd4de5f230ea087e89b8413bc46633ea7891eaf742656509270f11bd491f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Wash. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 37 — Failure To Make Discove… · binding.law