WA · rules
Wash. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 27
Perpetuation of Testimony
(a) Perpetuation Before Action.
(1) Petition. A person who desires to perpetuate one’s own testimony or that of another
person regarding any matter that may be cognizable in any superior court may file a verified
petition in the superior court in the county of the residence of any expected adverse party. The
petition shall be entitled in the name of the petitioner and shall show:
(A) that the petitioner expects to be a party to an action cognizable in a superior court but is
presently unable to bring it or cause it to be brought;
(B) the subject matter of the expected action and the petitioner’s interest therein;
(C) the facts which the petitioner desires to establish by the proposed testimony and the
reasons for desiring to perpetuate it;
(D) the names or a description of the persons the petitioner expects will be adverse parties
and their addresses so far as known; and
(E) the names and addresses of the persons to be examined and the substance of the
testimony which the petitioner expects to elicit from each, and shall ask for an order authorizing
the petitioner to take the depositions of the persons to be examined named in the petition, for the
purpose of perpetuating their testimony.
(2) Notice and Service. The petitioner shall thereafter serve a notice upon each person
named in the petition as an expected adverse party, together with a copy of the petition, stating
that the petitioner will apply to the court, at a time and place named therein, for the order
described in the petition. At least 20 days before the date of hearing the notice shall be served in
the manner provided by law for service of summons; but if such service cannot with due
diligence be made upon any expected adverse party named in the petition, the court may make
such order as is just for service by publication or otherwise, and shall appoint, for persons not
served personally in the manner provided by law, an attorney who shall represent them and, in
case they are not otherwise represented, shall cross-examine the deponent. If any expected
adverse party is a minor or incompetent, the court shall make such order as deemed appropriate
for the protection of the minor or incompetent as provided in RCW 4.08.050 and 4.08.060.
(3) Order and Examination. If the court is satisfied that the perpetuation of the testimony
may prevent a failure or delay of justice, it shall make an order designating or describing the
persons whose depositions may be taken and specifying the subject matter of the examination
and whether the depositions shall be taken upon oral examination or written interrogatories. The
depositions may then be taken in accordance with these rules; and the court may make orders of
the character provided for by rules 34 and 35. For the purpose of applying these rules to
depositions for perpetuating testimony, each reference therein to the court in which the action is
pending shall be deemed to refer to the court in which the petition for such deposition was filed.
(4) Use of Deposition. If a deposition to perpetuate testimony is taken under these rules or
if, although not so taken, it would be admissible in evidence in the courts of the state in which it
is taken, it may be used in any action involving the same subject matter subsequently brought in a
superior court of this state, in accordance with the provisions of rule 32(a).
(b) Perpetuation Pending Appeal. If an appeal has been taken from a judgment of a
superior court or before the taking of an appeal if the time therefor has not expired, the superior
court in which the judgment was rendered may allow the taking of the depositions of witnesses to
perpetuate their testimony for use in the event of further proceedings in the superior court. In
such case the party who desires to perpetuate the testimony may make a motion in the superior
court for leave to take the depositions, upon the same notice and service thereof as if the action
was pending in the superior court. The motion shall show
(1) the names and addresses of the persons to be examined and the substance of the
testimony which the party expects to elicit from each;
(2) the reasons for perpetuating their testimony. If the court finds that the perpetuation of
the testimony is proper to avoid a failure or delay of justice, it may make an order allowing the
depositions to be taken and may make orders of the character provided for by rules 34 and 35,
and thereupon the depositions may be taken and used in the same manner and under the same
conditions as are prescribed in these rules for depositions taken in actions pending in the superior
court.
(c) Perpetuation by Action. This rule does not limit the power of a court to entertain an
action to perpetuate testimony.
History
[Adopted effective July 1, 1967; Amended effective September 1, 2005; April 28, 2015.]
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.wa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-16
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
619ab8b17997b9464c667c05d60b33fffca4afdceb1b2f101f9ac3e0114ed369
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.