Bindinglaw

WA · rules

Wash. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 16

Pretrial Procedure and Formulating Issues

activein force · 1967-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Hearing Matters Considered. By order, or on the motion of any party, the court may

in its discretion direct the attorneys for the parties to appear before it for a conference to

consider:

(1) The simplification of the issues;

(2) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings;

(3) The possibility of obtaining admissions of fact and of documents which will avoid

unnecessary proof;

(4) The limitation of the number of expert witnesses;

(5) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the action.

(b) Pretrial Order. The court shall make an order which recites the action taken at the

conference, the amendments allowed to the pleadings, and the agreements made by the parties as

to any of the matters considered, and which limits the issues for trial to those not disposed of by

admissions or agreements of counsel; and such order when entered controls the subsequent

course of the action, unless modified at the trial to prevent manifest injustice. The court in its

discretion may establish by rule a pretrial calendar on which actions may be placed for

consideration as above provided and may either confine the calendar to jury actions or to nonjury

actions or extend it to all actions.

History

[Adopted effective July 1, 1967.]

Provenance

Source
www.courts.wa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-16
Edition
2026-09-16
Content hash
4333c1d15f14015eaddc3e8b5558b0a8717d3bfc4205c4543cab19f380186bc5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.