VT · rules
V.R.E.F. Rule 4
REGISTERING PROCESS; RESPONSIBILITIES
(a) Registration Process. A person must register to electronically file and serve documents
through the electronic filing system, and choose the appropriate type of registration—
independent user, or user with an existing firm.
(b) Obligations and Responsibilities.
(1) Registering to electronically file and efiling a document in a case constitutes consent to
receive electronic service by notice that a filing has been made.
(2) An efiler is responsible for all documents filed or served under the efiler’s account.
(3) An efiler must create a service contact after registering, must check the “Make This
Contact Public” box, and must immediately update the efiler’s service contact information when
changes occur.
(4) An attorney may permit an associated attorney or other person authorized by the attorney
to file and view documents on the attorney’s behalf. The attorney is responsible for all such
filings and for any misuse of documents that are viewed or downloaded.
(c) Registration To View Documents That Are Not Publicly Accessible. To view
nonpublicly accessible portions of the electronic case file or documents not accessible over the
internet, persons—including those with specific rights of access pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules
for Public Access to Court Records—must separately register with the public-access portal,
providing verification of their specific right of access.
Reporter’s Notes—2020
Subdivision (a) requires that a person must register to file and
serve documents through the electronic filing system.
Subdivision (b) establishes the obligations and responsibilities of
persons who register to file and serve documents through the
electronic filing system. Subdivision (b)(1) provides that
registration constitutes consent to receive electronic service by
notice that a filing has been made. Subdivisions (b)(2) and (3)
establish that an efiler is responsible for all documents filed or
served under the efiler’s account, and that an efiler is responsible
for updating registration information, including service contacts, to
assure proper service upon the efiler by others. Finally, subdivision
(b)(4), applicable to attorneys, permits an attorney to authorize an
associate attorney or other person to file and view documents
under the attorney’s efiling account. However, the attorney is
responsible for all such filings and for any misuse of documents
that are viewed or downloaded.
Subdivisions (a) and (b) establish a requirement of registration to
file and serve documents through the electronic filing system, and
the obligations and responsibilities of efilers, but they do not
address the issue of remote access for viewing of electronic case
files that are not publicly accessible. Subject to certain statutory
exceptions, a person need not be an electronic filer to access
electronic records for viewing only. See, e.g., 12 V.S.A. § 5.
Subdivision (c) explains that persons seeking remote access to
nonpublicly accessible electronic documents must separately
register to use the public access portal. To view records that are not
publicly accessible or are publicly accessible only at courthouse
terminals, and for those persons with specific rights of access
under Rule 5 of the Rules for Public Access to Court Records, the
system will require specific registration requirements, including
verification procedures, to authorize “elevated” access status to
view such records. The prescribed registration to view in this rule
has no connection to a person’s ability to view existing paper case
files maintained by clerks of court.
Reporter’s Notes—2020 Amendments
Subdivision (a) is amended to conform the text of the rule to
actual practice in the Odyssey efiling system. In Odyssey, in
contrast to an Independent (self-represented) User, a “Firm”
registers, which includes solo practitioners, as well as government
agencies. The Firm Administrator authorizes access for all user
accounts in that firm. More information on how to register is
provided in judiciary and vendor manuals.
The amended language in paragraph (b)(4) addresses how others
inside a firm may be authorized to file and view on an attorney’s
behalf.
Subdivision (c) is amended to further clarify the process to
secure elevated access to case documents not publicly accessible
via the internet. Registration in the efiling system provides access
to documents filed by the efiler. To view other documents in the
case, including those filed by another party, the filer must register
with the public access portal, and receive authorization. This is a
one-time process for each portal user, which provides ongoing
access for all subsequent cases in which the user is involved. See
also V.R.P.A.C.R. 5 (governing specific rights of access by
attorneys, parties, and others, to case records that are not otherwise
publicly accessible).
Reporter’s Note—2021 Amendment
Rule 4(b)(3) is amended to clarify that an efiler must enter a
current service contact email address as a condition of registration,
and to further require immediate updating of a changed service
contact address. This assures effective service via the efiling
system File and Serve function.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
19d224e38f15ee836ba086c8a66f51fe063652654a23b5eb00de71b43223dcd0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.