VT · rules
V.R.E.F. Rule 1
TITLE; APPLICABILITY; EFFECTIVE DATES
(a) Title. These rules may be known and cited as the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic
Filing.
(b) Scope. These rules apply to all actions and proceedings commenced in the divisions and
units of the superior court authorized by the Court Administrator under subdivision (e), except
for the actions specified in subdivision (c), and to actions and proceedings in the judicial bureau
authorized by the Court Administrator under subdivision (f). These rules also apply to all actions
and proceedings commenced in the Supreme Court on or after the date specified pursuant to
subdivision (d) and in actions and proceedings existing in the Supreme Court on that date.
(c) Exception for Existing Electronic Filing. Electronic filing in effect prior to promulgation
of the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing will be conducted under the existing 2010
Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing and according to the applicability provisions of Rule 1(a) of
those rules. When the Court Administrator directs that electronic filing be implemented in a
division, unit, and type of case in which electronic filing is already occurring, the 2020 Vermont
Rules for Electronic Filing will apply to all efiling that occurs after the date specified by the
Court Administrator.
(d) Authorization for Electronic Filing in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court by
administrative order may direct that electronic filing will go into effect in the Court as of a
specified date. The Court Administrator must send notice by email to all members of the
Vermont Bar of the directive at least 30 days before the specified date and provide instructions
on how to efile under these rules.
(e) Authorization for Electronic Filing in the Superior Court. The Court Administrator may
direct a unit and/or division of the superior court to implement electronic filing in some or all
types of cases as of a specific date. The Court Administrator must send notice by email to all
members of the Vermont Bar of the directive at least 30 days before the implementation date and
provide instructions on how to efile under these rules.
(f) Judicial Bureau. The Court Administrator may direct the judicial bureau to implement
electronic filing as of a specific date. The directive must be issued at least 30 days before the
implementation date. Electronic filing will apply to all cases commenced after the specified date
unless otherwise directed by the Court Administrator. Rule 3 notwithstanding, the directive must
specify those required and permitted to electronically file.
(g) Authorization for Electronic Filing for Hearing Panels of the Professional
Responsibility Board. The Court Administrator may implement electronic filing for hearing
panels of the Professional Responsibility Board as of a specific date. The Court Administrator
must send notice by email to all members of the Vermont Bar of the directive at least 30 days
before the implementation date and provide instructions on how to efile under these rules.
(h) Authorization of Alternate Form of Electronic Transmission. The Court Administrator
may authorize some or all filings of a specified type of filer in a specified type of case to be
transmitted electronically to the electronic case file.
Reporter’s Notes—2020
The new case management system, called Odyssey, will be
implemented in the superior court by rollout in location-by-
location over time. The rule gives the Court Administrator the
authority to determine when units and divisions of the superior
court will implement electronic filing and in what case types. The
Court Administrator must provide at least 30 days’ notice of each
implementation directive to all licensed lawyers in the state and
provide instructions by whatever means deemed appropriate on
how to efile.
These rules apply to filings made on or after the date specified in
the directive of the Court Administrator, whether in existing cases
or in new cases. Cases in the following categories will continue to
use the eCabinet electronic filing system and be governed by the
2010 rules until the new CMS is rolled out in these courts: the
superior court (a) in the civil division for Rutland and Windsor
units commenced on or after January 26, 2011, excluding stalking
and sexual assault actions and small claims actions filed before
January 25, 2016; (b) the civil division of Rutland, Windsor,
Orange, and Addison units with respect to small claims actions
commenced on or after January 25, 2016; (c) the civil division of
Windsor and Rutland counties with respect to small claims appeals
commenced on or after January 25, 2016; and (d) cases in the
Environmental Division, commenced on after January 4, 2016.
Subdivision (e) authorizes the Court Administrator to specify the
date of the implementation of efiling in the judicial bureau and
specify who is required and who is permitted to efile. As with
efiling in the superior court, the directive must be issued at least 30
days before implementation will commence. The method of notice
of the directive is left up to the Court Administrator. The directive
applies both to existing cases and to new cases. These rules will
apply to judicial bureau cases to the extent an issue or requirement
is not covered in a separate rule specifically created for the judicial
bureau or in the Court Administrator’s directive.
Subdivision (f) allows the Court Administrator to authorize
electronic transmission of certain filings into the electronic casefile
by a method other than efiling. This might occur where a filer in
many cases, for example a prosecutor, desires to make bulk filings
of certain documents for many cases and can transmit these filings
in a manner that will be accepted by the judiciary’s electronic
casefile and appear for access as if they were filed through the
efiling system.
Note that the electronic transmission into the judiciary system is
still subject to the requirements of these rules. Thus, each
document filed by this method must: meet the requirements of
Rules 5(b) and 7(a), except the size-limit restriction contained in
Rule 7(a)(2); conform to the signature requirements in Rule 9(a)-
(c); include payment of any required fee that would have been
applicable if the filing had been made through the electronic filing
system; and be served pursuant to Rule 11 if applicable.
Reporter’s Notes—2021 Amendment
Rule 1(b) is amended to make the efiling rules applicable to the
Supreme Court. New subdivision (d) establishes the procedure for
instituting electronic filing in the Supreme Court and actions needed to
instigate efiling. Efiling commences pursuant to these rules when the
Court issues an administrative order. The order must be made with
enough time for the Court Administrator to give at least 30 days’
notice to the Vermont Bar of the Court order and provide instructions
on how to efile. Efiling pursuant to these rules will commence on that
date in all cases open in the Court, including those initiated in the
Court prior to that date, and all cases commenced in the Court
thereafter. This will include cases in which the Supreme Court is
acting under Administrative Order 9, related to lawyer discipline,
disability, or competency, even though it is reviewing action by a
Professional Responsibility Board hearing panel where efiling has not
been implemented. As in the trial courts, efiling will be mandatory
pursuant to Rule 3(a) unless an exception applies pursuant to Rule
3(b)-(d).
Reporter’s Notes—2026 Amendment
Rule 1(g) is added to authorize the Court Administrator to
implement efiling for hearing panels of the Professional Responsibility
Board, organized pursuant to Administrative Order 9. Former 1(g) is
relettered as 1(h).
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
7671dd13adedfc6b59c7035cd2b8e67729012520ca11abb0881f9e247bf6f62b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.