VT · rules
Vt. Sup. Ct. Promulgation Order of June 23, 2026: VRE615Corrected
Promulgation Order Correcting Order Amending Rule 615 of the Vermont Rules of Evidence
STATE OF VERMONT
VERMONT SUPREME COURT
JUNE TERM, 2026
Promulgation Order Correcting Order Amending Rule 615 of the Vermont Rules of
Evidence
Pursuant to the Vermont Constitution, Chapter II, § 37, and 12 V.S.A. § 1, it is hereby ordered:
1. That this Court’s order amending Rule 615 of the Vermont Rules of Evidence, promulgated
on February 10, 2026, effective July 1, 2026, be replaced with the following order that contains
that same amended rule language but updates the Reporter’s Notes (deleted matter struck
through; new matter underlined):
RULE 615. EXCLUSION OF WITNESSES
(a) At the request of a party the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear
the trial testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion; after a
witness’s trial testimony has been completed, however, the witness may remain within the
courtroom, even if the witness subsequently may be called upon by the other party or recalled in
rebuttal, unless a party shows good cause for the witness to be excluded. This rule does not
authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) one an officer or employee of a
party which is not a natural person if that officer or employee has been designated as its
representative by its attorney, or (3) any a person whose presence is shown by a party to be
essential to the presentation of the party’s cause., or (4) a person authorized by statute to be
present.
(b) A court may also make additional orders, such as prohibiting disclosure of trial testimony
to witnesses who are excluded from the courtroom and prohibiting excluded witnesses from
accessing trial testimony. Any additional order entered under this subdivision shall specify the
witnesses who are subject to the order, and the content of the prohibited disclosure.
Reporter’s Notes—2026 Amendment
The amendment follows similar amendments to Federal Rule of
Evidence 615. Although expert witnesses are not specifically
identified in the text of the rule, courts “commonly approve the
designation of experts as essential” under Federal Rule 615(a)(3). 29
C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 6245 (2d ed.
2025). Such a designation does not undermine the purposes of the rule,
because experts typically are not testifying about factual matters
within their personal knowledge, but rather providing an opinion based
upon testimony and information supplied by others. Id.
Subdivision (a) is amended to specify that it applies to “trial”
testimony to limit the applicability of the rule to court proceedings and
exclude application to depositions, which are controlled by the civil
rules. This distinguishes the Vermont rule from its federal counterpart.
Use of the word “trial” is meant to provide the court with broad
authority to regulate disclosure of courtroom testimony to witnesses
during evidentiary hearings that are being conducted pursuant to these
rules.
New subdivision (b) clarifies that a court issuing a sequestration
order may also “prohibit excluded witnesses from learning about,
obtaining, or being provided with trial testimony.” Advisory
Committee Notes—2023 Amendments, F.R.E. 615. “The rule gives
the court discretion to determine what requirements, if any, are
appropriate in a particular case to protect against the risk that
witnesses excluded from the courtroom will obtain trial testimony.” Id.
A court considering such an order should ensure that the scope of any
order is tailored to the core purpose of the rule of preventing witnesses
from tailoring their testimony to the evidence presented at trial and
does not improperly intrude upon trial preparation or the attorney-client relationship. Id.
2. That this rule is prescribed and promulgated effective July 1, 2026. The Reporter’s Notes
are advisory.
3. That the Chief Justice is authorized to report this rule to the General Assembly in
accordance with the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1, as amended.
Dated in Chambers at Montpelier, Vermont, this 23rd day of June, 2026.
____________________________________
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice
____________________________________
Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice
Signed by the Vermont Supreme Court ____________________________________
Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice
_______________________________________
Christina E. Nolan, Associate Justice
____________________________________
Michael P. Drescher, Associate Justice
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
9facef0550b5379f935fac6ac19110d4bc033bd48b693af9ffd6ef52b0ed6f4a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.