VT · rules
Vt. Sup. Ct. Promulgation Order of Oct. 6, 2025: VREF9(d)
Promulgation Order Amending Rule 9(d) of the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing
STATE OF VERMONT
VERMONT SUPREME COURT
OCTOBER TERM, 2025
Order Promulgating Amendments to Rule 9(d)
of the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing
Pursuant to the Vermont Constitution, Chapter II, § 37, and 12 V.S.A. § 1, it is hereby ordered:
1. That Rule 9(d) of the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing be amended as follows
(new matter underlined; deleted struck through):
RULE 9. SIGNATURES
(d) Signatures of Court Personnel.
(1) Judicial Officers. Judicial officers of the Supreme Court, the Superior Court, and the
Judicial Bureau may sign any court-generated document created, and to be sent, or filed in
electronic form subject to the following conditions:
(A) Judicial officers must create, through the Office of the Court Administrator, and
maintain an electronic facsimile of their signature.
(B) Judicial officers may sign any court-generated document created, and to be sent, or
filed in electronic form with their electronic facsimile signature followed by a signature block
containing the signer's typed name and title. That signature has the same effect as a
handwritten signature on a nonelectronic document.
(C) When judicial officers use an electronic facsimile signature on a document sent from
their official state email address or from another email address registered with the Court
Administrator, or file it in the electronic filing system, the signature is presumed valid.
(D) Judicial officers may delegate use of their electronic facsimile signature to an
authorized designee. Whenever a designee uses the facsimile signature, the designation must
be disclosed on the document.
(E) Unauthorized use of an electronic facsimile signature renders invalid the document
that was issued with the unauthorized signature unless the judicial officer ratifies use of the
signature.
(2) Court Personnel and Others. The electronic filing or transmission of any court-generated document by court personnel authorized to sign the document and by others authorized
to sign, including masters, receivers, guardians ad litem, parent coordinators, and neutrals
required to file a report, are deemed signed by senders if transmitted from their official state or
professional email address or filed by them in the electronic filing system accompanied by a
signature block containing the signer’s typed name and title.
Reporter’s Notes—2026 Amendment
Rule 9(d)(1), (d)(1)(B), and (d)(2) are amended to align the rule
language more closely with current practice. The rule previously
allowed electronic signatures to be used on “court-generated”
documents. In reality, courts and court personnel may
electronically sign documents that are not generated by the court.
For example, parties may file proposed orders.
2. That this amendment be prescribed and promulgated, effective on January 1, 2026. The
Reporter’s Notes are advisory.
3. That the Chief Justice is authorized to report these amendments to the General Assembly in
accordance with the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1, as amended.
Dated in Chambers at Montpelier, Vermont, this 6th day of October, 2025.
____________________________________
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice
____________________________________
Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice
____________________________________
Signed by the Vermont Supreme Court
William D. Cohen, Associate Justice
____________________________________
Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
3b50523743fba440ff300c7e39e69bf094bd9e1e9f7476d1f491e2617058c30c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.