Bindinglaw

VT · rules

Vt. Sup. Ct. Promulgation Order of Mar. 10, 2025: Disciplinary Control Judges Rules6(6)and Adding14

Promulgation Order Amending Rule 6(6) of and Adding Rule 14 to the Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges

activein force · 2025-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

STATE OF VERMONT

VERMONT SUPREME COURT

MARCH TERM 2025

Order Amending Rule 6(6) of and Adding Rule 14 to the Rules of Supreme Court for

Disciplinary Control of Judges

Pursuant to Chapter II, § 30, of the Vermont Constitution, it is hereby ordered:

1. That Rule 6(6) of the Vermont Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges

be amended as follows (new matter underlined; deleted matter struck through):

Rule 6. General Provisions

(6) The Board shall investigate any complaint submitted to it and may investigate conduct or

disability upon its own motion, subject to the following:

(a) Any complaint must contain a concise statement of facts which, if true, would indicate

probable misconduct or disability.

(b) The Board will not docket a complaint of misconduct, which is repetitive of a prior

complaint that was found nonmeritorious and is filed by the same complainant. The Chair or the

Vice Chair determines whether the complaint meets this standard.

Reporter’s Notes—2025 Amendment

Rule 6 is amended to add subdivisions (a) and (b) regarding

complaints of misconduct or disability. First, new Rule 6(6)(a) requires

that the complaint must contain a concise statement of facts to support

the alleged misconduct or disability. This requirement allows the

Board to focus its attention and resources on colorable complaints.

Second, under new Rule 6(6)(b), repetitive complaints filed by the

same complainant need not be addressed by the Board. The Chair or

Vice Chair of the Board determines whether a complaint meets the

standard.

2. That Rule 14 of the Vermont Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges be

added to read as follows:

Rule 14. Abuse of Complaint Procedure

A complainant who has filed repetitive, harassing, or frivolous complaints, or has otherwise

abused the complaint procedure, may be restricted from filing further complaints, based on a

majority vote of the Board. After giving the complainant an opportunity to show cause in writing

why the right to file further complaints should not be limited, the Board may prohibit, restrict, or

impose conditions on the complainant’s use of the complaint procedure. Upon written request of

the complainant, the Board, for good cause shown may revise or withdraw any prohibition,

restriction, or conditions previously imposed.

Reporter’s Notes—2025 Amendment

Rule 14 is added to provide a mechanism for the Board to

restrict the filing of complaints by complainants who have abused

the procedure. Successive and frivolous complaints strain limited

resources and do not further the purposes of the complaint

procedure. The rule is based on a federal court rule also aimed at

curtailing abuse of the complaint procedure.

3. That these rules are prescribed and promulgated effective July 1, 2025. The Reporter’s

Notes are advisory.

4. That the Chief Justice is authorized to report this rule to the General Assembly in

accordance with the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1, as amended.

Dated in Chambers at Montpelier, Vermont, this 10th day of March, 2025.

____________________________________

Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice

_____________________________________

Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice

_____________________________________

Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice

Signed by the Vermont Supreme Court

_____________________________________

William D. Cohen, Associate Justice

_____________________________________

Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice

Provenance

Source
www.vtcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
549709cae15cc859f6ca0a05e205309cd67dc3f1ea397524112c0f6c8032f86f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.