VT · rules
Vt. Sup. Ct. Promulgation Order of Mar. 10, 2025: Disciplinary Control Judges Rules6(6)and Adding14
Promulgation Order Amending Rule 6(6) of and Adding Rule 14 to the Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges
STATE OF VERMONT
VERMONT SUPREME COURT
MARCH TERM 2025
Order Amending Rule 6(6) of and Adding Rule 14 to the Rules of Supreme Court for
Disciplinary Control of Judges
Pursuant to Chapter II, § 30, of the Vermont Constitution, it is hereby ordered:
1. That Rule 6(6) of the Vermont Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges
be amended as follows (new matter underlined; deleted matter struck through):
Rule 6. General Provisions
(6) The Board shall investigate any complaint submitted to it and may investigate conduct or
disability upon its own motion, subject to the following:
(a) Any complaint must contain a concise statement of facts which, if true, would indicate
probable misconduct or disability.
(b) The Board will not docket a complaint of misconduct, which is repetitive of a prior
complaint that was found nonmeritorious and is filed by the same complainant. The Chair or the
Vice Chair determines whether the complaint meets this standard.
Reporter’s Notes—2025 Amendment
Rule 6 is amended to add subdivisions (a) and (b) regarding
complaints of misconduct or disability. First, new Rule 6(6)(a) requires
that the complaint must contain a concise statement of facts to support
the alleged misconduct or disability. This requirement allows the
Board to focus its attention and resources on colorable complaints.
Second, under new Rule 6(6)(b), repetitive complaints filed by the
same complainant need not be addressed by the Board. The Chair or
Vice Chair of the Board determines whether a complaint meets the
standard.
2. That Rule 14 of the Vermont Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges be
added to read as follows:
Rule 14. Abuse of Complaint Procedure
A complainant who has filed repetitive, harassing, or frivolous complaints, or has otherwise
abused the complaint procedure, may be restricted from filing further complaints, based on a
majority vote of the Board. After giving the complainant an opportunity to show cause in writing
why the right to file further complaints should not be limited, the Board may prohibit, restrict, or
impose conditions on the complainant’s use of the complaint procedure. Upon written request of
the complainant, the Board, for good cause shown may revise or withdraw any prohibition,
restriction, or conditions previously imposed.
Reporter’s Notes—2025 Amendment
Rule 14 is added to provide a mechanism for the Board to
restrict the filing of complaints by complainants who have abused
the procedure. Successive and frivolous complaints strain limited
resources and do not further the purposes of the complaint
procedure. The rule is based on a federal court rule also aimed at
curtailing abuse of the complaint procedure.
3. That these rules are prescribed and promulgated effective July 1, 2025. The Reporter’s
Notes are advisory.
4. That the Chief Justice is authorized to report this rule to the General Assembly in
accordance with the provisions of 12 V.S.A. § 1, as amended.
Dated in Chambers at Montpelier, Vermont, this 10th day of March, 2025.
____________________________________
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice
_____________________________________
Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice
_____________________________________
Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice
Signed by the Vermont Supreme Court
_____________________________________
William D. Cohen, Associate Justice
_____________________________________
Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
549709cae15cc859f6ca0a05e205309cd67dc3f1ea397524112c0f6c8032f86f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.