VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, June 2, 2025
Memo To Bar - June 2, 2025 - Promulgated and Proposed Rules, Vermont Judiciary Migrating Virtual Hearing Capabilities, Attorney License Renewal Period, Supreme Court Administrative Directives, eFile and Serve and Public Portal Information
SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
THERESE CORSONES, ESQ. Mailing Address
State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
Therese.Corsones@vtcourts.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
Telephone (802) 828-3278
FAX: 802 828-3457
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Teri Corsones, Esq., State Court Administrator
RE: Promulgated and Proposed Rules, Vermont Judiciary Migrating Virtual Hearing
Capabilities, Attorney License Renewal Period, Supreme Court Administrative
Directives, eFile and Serve and Public Portal Information, Filing of Exhibits & Other
Miscellaneous Info
DATE: June 2, 2025
For your information, please find:
• Vermont Judiciary Migrating Virtual Hearing Capabilities
• Promulgation Order Amending Rule 502 of the Vermont Rules of Evidence
• Promulgation Order Amending Rules 2(a), 9(b), 9(c)(7)(D), 11, 12, 13, 15(c), and 20(c) of
the Rules of Admission
• Promulgation Order Making Permanent Amendments to Rule 9.2 of the Vermont Rules of
Civil Procedure
• Proposed Order Amending Rules 10(b)(8)(A) and 31(a)(1) of the Vermont Rules of
Appellate Procedure
• Reminder: Several promulgation orders effective July 1, 2025
• Supreme Court Administrative Directives (Case Disposition Guidelines)
• Attorney License Renewal Period
• eFile & Serve and Public Portal Information
• Filing of Exhibits for Evidentiary Hearing
• Miscellaneous
Vermont Judiciary Migrating Virtual Hearing Capabilities
The Vermont Judiciary is migrating virtual hearing capabilities from Webex to Zoom in calendar
year 2025. Please be on the lookout for additional communication from the Judiciary regarding
migration of individual counties and training sessions. More information can be found at
https://zoom.vtcourts.gov including timelines and documentation about using the Zoom
platform.
I. PROMULGATED RULE AMENDMENTS
a. Promulgation Order Amending Rule 502 of the Vermont Rules of Evidence
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/PROMULGATED--VRE502--STAMPED
This Order was promulgated on June 2, 2025, effective January 1, 2026.
This amendment to Rule 502 extends an evidentiary privilege to communications between a
client and a lawyer referral and information service made for the purpose of seeking professional
legal services. The amendment does not affect the rules of professional conduct or otherwise
define what constitutes an attorney-client relationship.
b. Promulgation Order Amending Rules 2(a), 9(b), 9(c)(7)(D), 11, 12, 13, 15(c), and 20(c) of
the Rules of Admission
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/PROMULGATED--
2025OrderAmendingVermontRulesofAdmission2(a)etcSTAMPED
This Order was promulgated on June 2, 2025, effective January 1, 2026.
These amendments are intended to encourage new attorneys to stay and practice in Vermont.
The amendment to Rule 2(a)(8) removes the requirement in the catch-all provision that the legal
work must be performed in a jurisdiction in which the applicant is admitted. The amendment to
Rule 9(b)(1) removes the requirement that the UBE exam must be taken no later than 5 years
after an applicant completes the necessary educational requirements. To the Board’s knowledge,
no other jurisdiction has such a rule. The amendment to Rule 9(c)(7)(D) allows an applicant who
is denied admission after achieving a passing score to use that score to satisfy the exam
requirement for admission for up to 5 years. The amendment to Rule 11 removes the good-cause
extension for achieving a passing score on the MPRE within 3 years of passing the UBE.
There are several amendments to Rule 12 concerning CLEs and the mentorship requirement.
Under the changes, applicants may commence their mentorship up to one year prior to
admission to the bar and may count CLEs towards their mentorship hours. This change reflects
the Board’s desire to lessen the post-admission burden to applicants admitted by examination or
transferred UBE score. Rule 12(b) is amended to change the result of a failure to complete the
first-year requirements from suspension to placement on inactive status.
Rule 13, concerning admission by transferred UBE score, is amended in (b)(2) to extend the age
of a qualifying transferred UBE score to 5 years. To conform to the Rule 9 changes, Rule 13(d) is
deleted to remove the five-years-from-graduation requirement. In conjunction with the
amendment to Rule 11, former Rule 13(e) pertaining to the MPRE removes the good-cause
extension. Also, the age of a usable MPRE score is extended to 5 years, to match the age of a
usable UBE score.
The amendment to Rule 15(c) simplifies the language and requires that an attorney admitted
without examination is subject to the post-admission CLE requirement detailed in Rule 12(a)(1).
The amendment to Rule 20(c) allows the Board to extend for good cause the 90-day time limit on
completing an oath of admission, signing the licensing statement, and paying the licensing fee.
c. Promulgation Order Making Permanent Amendments to Rule 9.2 of the Vermont Rules of
Civil Procedure
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/PROMULGATED-VRCP9.2PERMANENT--STAMPED
This Order was promulgated on June 2, 2025, effective October 1, 2025.
Rule 9.2 was adopted September 13, 2022, effective October 1, 2022, to effectuate
requirements of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law
No. 116-136, 15 U.S.C. § 9058. The promulgation order provided that the Rule would expire
September 30, 2025, and directed the Advisory Committee to review the operation of Rule 9.2
and recommend whether to terminate, extend, or revise the rule. V.R.C.P. 9.2(b) enforces the
existing notice requirement in 15 U.S.C. § 9058(c)(1). As such, V.R.C.P. 19.2 is made permanent
and remains in effect.
II. PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS
(NOTE: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN PROPOSED AND HAVE NOT BEEN
APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT.)
Proposed Order Amending Rules 10(b)(8)(A) and 31(a)(1) of the Vermont Rules of
Appellate Procedure
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/PROPOSED-VRAP10(b)(8)(A)and31(a)(1)--
FORCOMMENT
The proposed amendment to V.R.A.P. 10(b)(8) updates a cross reference to V.R.A.P. 24, which
was renumbered in 2021. The proposed amendment to V.R.A.P. 31(a) deletes an obsolete cross
reference to V.R.A.P. 10(c)(2), which was deleted in 2021 after the superior courts ceased using
video-recorded proceedings.
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by August 1, 2025, to Bridget Asay,
Esq., Chair of the Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure, at the following address:
Bridget Asay, Esq., Chair
Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure
basay@stris.com
III. PROMULGATED RULES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025
REMINDER: The following seven Orders, promulgated by the Court over the past several
months, will become effective July 1, 2025:
Promulgation Order Amending Rule 30(b) and (e) of the Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure
PROMULGATED--VRAP30(b)and(e)--STAMPED.pdf [promulgated 3/7/2025].
The amendment adds Rule 30(e) to state the filing deadlines for a required printed case and any
optional printed case. These deadlines were inadvertently omitted when the requirement of a
printed case was reinstated in 2024. Rule 30(e) provides that the appellant must file a required
printed case, or any optional printed case, when the appellant’s principal brief is filed. The
deadline for an appellee to file any supplemental printed case, formerly in subdivision (b), is
unchanged and is now in subdivision (e). Former subdivision (e), relating to costs of production is
relabeled as (f).
Promulgation Order Amending Rule 6(6) of and Adding Rule 14 to the Rules of Supreme Court
for Disciplinary Control of Judges
PROMULGATED--DisciplinaryControlJudgesRules6(6)andAdding14--STAMPED.pdf [promulgated
3/10/2025]
The amendment to Rule 6(6) imposes two requirements regarding complaints of misconduct or
disability. First, new Rule 6(6)(a) requires that the complaint must contain a concise statement of
facts to support the alleged misconduct or disability. This requirement allows the Board to focus
its attention and resources on colorable complaints. Second, under new Rule 6(6)(b), repetitive
complaints filed by the same complainant and found not be meritorious need not be addressed
by the Board. The Chair or Vice Chair of the Board determines whether a complaint meets the
standard.
The addition of Rule 14 provides a mechanism for the Board to restrict the filing of complaints by
complainants who have abused the procedure. Successive and frivolous complaints strain limited
resources and do not further the purposes of the complaint procedure. The rule is based on a
federal court rule also aimed at curtailing abuse of the complaint procedure.
Promulgation Order Amending Rule 12.D of Administrative Order No. 9, Permanent Rules
Governing Establishment and Operation of the Professional Responsibility Program
PROMULGATED--AO9Rule12D--STAMPED.pdf [promulgated 3/10/2025]
This amendment pertains to review of screening counsel’s decision to dismiss a complaint against
an attorney. The amendment specifies that a complainant must seek review of screening
counsel’s decision within 30 days of the date of the decision. The amendment also provides that
review is on the record.
Promulgation Order Deleting V.R.C.P. 11(e) and amending V.R.C.P. 43(d) and Rule 43(h);
V.R.C.P. 56(c)(1), (2), and (6); and Rule 56(d) and Rule 56(h)
PROMULGATED--VRCP-Deleting11(e)Amending43(d)(h)56(c)(1)(2)(6)(d)(h)--STAMPED.pdf
[promulgated 2/3/2025]
The amendments involve the use of a declaration in place of an affidavit or notarized statement.
Rule 11(e), which authorized use of a declaration in lieu of a statement made under oath, an
affidavit, or a notarized document is deleted. Rule 11(e) did not apply when an oath, affidavit, or
notarization was required by statute. Amendments to 4 V.S.A. § 27b by 2023, No. 46, § 4, permit
a broadening of the declaration rule. The changes simultaneously adopt Rule 43(h) and authorize
use of a declaration without exception whenever the rules or a court order require filing or
service of an affidavit or a statement signed under oath. Rule 56 is amended to refer to a
“declaration,” an unsworn document signed subject to the penalties of perjury under these rules
or applicable law. Under Rule 56(b)(6), a declaration used to support or oppose a summary
judgment motion must be based on personal knowledge.
Promulgation Order Amending Rules 3, 4(a)(2), (d)(6)(A), (e)(5), 5(a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(4)(A), (c), (f),
(h)(1)(A) and (k)(1) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings
PROMULGATED--
VRECP3,4(a)(2),4(d)(6)(A),4(e)(5),5(a)(2),(b)(1),(c),(f),(h)(1)(A)and(k)(1),5(b)(4)(A)--STAMPED.pdf
[promulgated 2/3/2025]
The amendment to Rule 5(b)(4)(A) requires service of the notice of appeal on the applicant
immediately after the appellant files the notice of appeal and mails a copy to the municipal panel.
The purpose of this proposed amendment is to provide sufficient notice to applicants and
mitigate delay while appellants are in the process of identifying other interested persons to
notify.
References to the now-abrogated 2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, which were replaced
with the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, have been deleted.
Promulgation Order Amending § 11(b) of Administrative Order No. 41 (Licensing of Attorneys)
PROMULGATED--AO41Section11(b)--STAMPED.pdf [promulgated 12/16/204]
Administrative Order 41 § 11(b) requires attorneys on pro bono emeritus status to obtain MCLE
credit in ethics. The amendment changes the amount of time from two hours to one to make
§ 11(b) consistent with Rule 3(B)(4) of the Vermont Rules for Mandatory Continuing Legal
Education, which sets the ethics requirement for attorneys on pro bono emeritus status at one
hour.
Promulgation Order Amending Promulgation Order Amending Rules 16.2 and 26(f) of the
Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure
PROMULGATED--VRCP16.2-26(f)--STAMPED.pdf [promulgated 12/16/2024]
The amendments Rule 16.2 on scheduling orders conform the rule to best practice. Under the
changes, a scheduling order may be issued on stipulation of the parties, without the necessity of
a hearing or conference. A date for the close of all discovery is added to the list of contents of a
scheduling order. This conforms to the standard form and is the key deadline used by clerks in
case-flow management. In addition, the amendment adds “other appropriate matters” to the list
of contents of a scheduling order. The amended rule also updates and re-organizes the language
of the rule for clarity, without changing the meaning or intent. The amendment to Rule 26(f)
clarifies that the plan and schedule for discovery to be established following a Rule 26(f)
discovery conference will be a scheduling order under Rule 16.2 and that, if Rule16.3 requires
mediation, the discovery conference order must include a date for completion of mediation. Rule
26(f) is amended to delete an existing provision about altering or amending a discovery order.
IV. ATTORNEY LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD
This is a reminder for attorneys due to renew their law license this year. Renewals must be done
through the Attorney Portal.
The deadline for renewing is July 1. Attorneys wishing to change their licensing status for the
2025-2027 reporting period will be able to do so via the renewal process. If you wish to relinquish
your license rather than renew, you can eFile this form prior to the July 1 deadline.
Attorneys can check this list to see if they need to renew this year:
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/sites/default/files/documents/AttorneyGoodStanding_43.pdf
V. SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVES
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/supreme-court/administrative-directives
The Supreme Court updated the administrative directives regarding disposition guidelines for
various kinds of cases. These are available on the judiciary website.
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/administrativedirective25
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/administrativedirective26
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/administrativedirective30
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/administrativedirective31
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/administrativedirective32
https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/administrativedirective34
VI. eFILE & SERVE AND PUBLIC PORTAL INFORMATION
eFile and Serve has provided information for court users who are not receiving email notifications
and who question whether their email addresses have mistakenly been placed on a “Suppression
List.” Here’s a link to information in that regard Why was my email placed on the Suppression
List? – eFile (zendesk.com). Here’s another link for court users who wish to have their email
addresses “Safelisted” to ensure proper delivery
https://odysseyfileandserve.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360046887411.
All Superior Courts, including the Environmental Division, the Judicial Bureau, and the Supreme
Court use eFile and Serve. Please use the following links to access the electronic filing and portal
systems and for more information.
Reminders for eFile Users:
Attorneys must select the party they represent as the “person responsible for fees” in the Fee
section of the filing process. Additionally, when the attorney represents more than one party,
attorneys should continue to select the same party as the “person responsible for fees”;
otherwise, the attorney will incur an additional efiling use fee.
eFile & Serve. eFile and Serve is the platform through which you electronically file with the
courts. To access eFile, please visit https://vermont.tylertech.cloud/OfsWeb/Home
You can access user guides through the “User Guides” link in the “Self Help” window. You can
also access docket-specific user guides and a new Frequently Asked Questions on the judiciary’s
website at www.vermontjudiciary.org/efiling
For technical support regarding eFile, please contact Tyler Technologies at 800-297-5377 or
efiling.support@tylertech.com
If you have procedural questions about eFile, please email the judiciary at
EFileSupport@vtcourts.gov
Odyssey Public Portal. The Odyssey Public Portal allows you to view your case files. To access the
portal, please visit https://portal.vtcourts.gov/Portal Before you can view your case files, you
must first register in the portal and then request elevated access. The Public Portal User Guide
contains instructions on how to register and request elevated access. You can read the user guide
on our website at https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/public-portal
For technical support regarding the Public Portal, please contact the Vermont Judiciary’s
HelpDesk at itsupport@vtcourts.gov When emailing, please write “Public Portal” in the subject
line.
VII. FILING OF EXHIBITS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
Per the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, all electronically filed documents (including
exhibit lists and exhibits) must be submitted in PDF format. The Vermont Judiciary’s website
provides detailed instructions on how to submit exhibits for use at trials and other kinds of
evidentiary hearings. https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/FilersGuidetoExhibitsforHearings
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Court Forms
Court forms are constantly being updated. Please refer to the judiciary website for the most up-to-date forms, https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/court-forms
Please use the link below to report any form question, concern or issue
http://www.vermontjudiciary.org/website-feedback-form or you can access our Website
Feedback program at the bottom of each web page.
b. Obligation under A.O. 41
Attorneys are reminded that an “attorney must report to the State Court Administrator within
thirty days any change of the office mailing or electronic mail address” and that “[n]otice sent to a
reported address is sufficient even if not received by the attorney because of failure to report the
proper address or failure of delivery not caused by the court.” A.O. 41, § 4(c). To update changes
in your contact information, please access your attorney account with the Attorney Portal
c. Receipt of Court Notices and Orders (eCabinet)
The Vermont courts send all court-issued documents (hearing notices, orders, etc.) to attorneys
by email using the email addresses registered in a system called eCabinet. Attorneys may register
up to three email addresses in the system and are responsible for keeping the information
updated. The email address(es) registered in eCabinet are not used for service of documents filed
by opposing parties, which is done through service contacts in Odyssey File & Serve.
To create an eCabinet account or update an existing account, attorneys must contact the
Judiciary helpdesk through one of the methods listed below. Please include your attorney bar
license number in your communication.
• Email itsupport@vtcourts.gov
• Telephone the Judiciary helpdesk at 802-828-4357
• Use the online form eCabinet Registration/Update (cognitoforms.com)
Updating information in the Attorney Portal or in eCabinet does not automatically notify the
other. It is your responsibility to update both. If you are a member of the Vermont Bar
Association, you will also need to separately notify the VBA.
d. Notice of Vacation
Attorneys may notify the superior courts of their vacation schedules by emailing
CentralClerkReview@vtcourts.gov. The information will be available to all trial courts, including
the Probate Division and the Judicial Bureau, for scheduling purposes. Attorneys do not need to
send notices separately to each county or division of the superior court.
If attorneys wish to also notify the Vermont Supreme Court of their vacation schedules, they
should copy supremecourt@vtcourts.gov on the email. Any questions, please
contact centralclerkreview@vtcourts.gov.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
c9432be190f433feb28b40dee48c7ca3a3a766893f6d25ea2131a95d3481dfa5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.