VT · rules
Vt. Memo to the Bar, Apr. 18, 2022
Memo to Bar - April 18 2022 - Promulgated and Proposed Rules Odyssey Misc
SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT
OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR
SCOTT GRIFFITH Mailing Address
Interim State Court Administrator Office of the Court Administrator
Scott.Griffith@vermont.gov 109 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05609-0701
Telephone (802) 828-3278
FAX: 802 828-3457
www.vermontjudiciary.org
TO: Members of the Vermont Bar
FROM: Scott Griffith, Interim State Court Administrator
RE: Promulgated and Proposed Rules, Odyssey File and Serve and Public Portal Information,
Filing of Exhibits & Other Miscellaneous Info
DATE: April 18, 2022
To ensure you continue to receive these emails, please add JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov and
JUD.CAOMemotoBar@vermont.gov to your Safe Senders list.
For your information, please find:
• Promulgation Order Amending V.R.C.P. 50(b)
• Promulgation Order Amending V.R.C.P. 68
• Promulgation Order Amending V.R.S.C.P. 7 and 8
• Promulgation Order Amending Rules 2(a)(2) and (3), 6(a) and (c)(2)(3), 6.1(a) and (c)(1),
and 8(h) of the Vermont Rules for Family Proceedings
• Promulgation Order Amending Rule 18(d)(2) of the Vermont Rules for Family Proceedings
• Promulgation Order Adding V.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(4)
• Promulgation Order Amending A.O. 14
• Proposed Order Amending V.R.A.P. 33.1 and 34
• Proposed Order Amending A.O. 41 § 4 and Adding § 18
• Proposed Order Amending A.O. 9, Rules 7, 8, 20 and 26
• Odyssey File and Serve and Public Portal Information
• Filing of Exhibits
• Miscellaneous
I. PROMULGATED RULE AMENDMENTS
a. Promulgation Order Amending V.R.C.P. 50(b)
V.R.C.P. 50(b) is amended in response to the Vermont Supreme Court’s request in Blondin v. Milton
Town School District, 2021 VT 2, ¶ 26 n. 10, __ Vt. __, 251 A.3d 959, that the Civil Rules Committee
consider whether that rule “should be amended to be consistent with the federal rule and potentially to
allow consideration of pure questions of law on appeal absent renewal following judgment.” The
amendment to V.R.C.P. 50(b) limits the requirement to renew a motion for judgment as a matter of law
when it is a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim.
b. Promulgation Order Amending V.R.C.P. 68
Rule 68 is amended to allow plaintiffs to make offers of judgment where the rule previously only
allowed such offers by defendants. The change was initially adopted as part of Administrative Order 49
to make the practice more widely available at a time when in-person civil jury trials were largely on hold
pursuant to Administrative Order No. 49, ¶ 24. The present amendment makes the change permanent.
c. Promulgation Order Amending V.R.S.C.P. 7 and 8
V.R.S.C.P. 7 is amended to address issues that have been plaguing the small claims docket. The
amendments require personal service of judgments before financial disclosure hearings can be held and
extend the time period between new financial disclosure hearings. The amendments also include some
simple language changes to make the rules clearer. Simultaneously adopted amendments of V.R.S.C.P.
8 modernize and simplify the contempt process for failure to appear at a financial-disclosure hearing.
The amendments clarify the basis for a contempt finding and narrow the remedies available for
contempt. They also simplify the process for creditors seeking a contempt order.
d. Promulgation Order Amending Rules 2(a)(2) and (3), 6(a) and (c)(2)(3), 6.1(a) and (c)(1), and
8(h) of the Vermont Rules for Family Proceedings
Rule 2(a)(2) is amended to eliminate the reference to V.R.C.P. 78(a), (Motion Days) which was
abrogated by order of June 7, effective August 9, 2021. Rule 2(a)(3) is amended to replace the
reference to V.R.C.P. 78(b) with a reference to V.R.C.P. 7(b)(4) (Memorandum in Opposition),
added by that order and embodying the provisions of former V.R.C.P. 78(b)(1) in revised form.
Provisions of Rules 6 and 6.1 are deleted because the probate rules now contain provisions on the
appointment of guardians and attorneys in probate proceedings. See V.R.P.P. 80.9 (Representation
by Guardians ad Litem of Minors) and V.R.P.P. 80.10 (Representation by Attorneys and Guardians
ad Litem of Adults in Specified Proceedings). In addition, the reference to the title of 18 V.S.A.
Chapter 206 is amended to be consistent with legislation enacted in 2014. 2013, No. 96 (Adj. Sess.),
§ 114.
Rule 6.1(c)(1) is amended to replace the reference to V.R.C.P. 78(b) (Disposition of Written
Motions With or Without Hearing), which was abrogated by order of June 7, effective August 9,
2021, with a reference to V.R.C.P. 7(b)(6) (Evidentiary Hearings) added by that order and
embodying its relevant provisions in revised form.
Rule 8(h) is amended to eliminate the reference to V.R.C.P. 78 (Motion Day), which was
abrogated by order of June 7, effective August 9, 2021. All relevant provisions of the former
V.R.C.P. 78 are now incorporated in V.R.C.P. 7.
e. Promulgation Order Amending Rule 18(d)(2) of the Vermont Rules for Family Proceedings
The amendment to Rule 18(d)(2) clarifies that mediation can take place either in person or using
remote technology.
A.O. 49 was initially issued March 16, 2020, in response to the state of emergency resulting from
the pandemic. Paragraph 13 of A.O. 49 authorized remote participation in mediation by video or
telephone without a stipulation or court order. Further, in anticipation that at some point A.O. 49
would no longer be necessary, the Supreme Court requested that the Advisory Committee on Rules
for Family Proceedings consider whether there should be a permanent change to Rule 18 related to
remote participation. After considering responses from attorneys who practice family law to a
Vermont Bar Association survey and responses from family mediators, the Committee concluded
that both in person and remote participation in mediation should be permissible in family
proceedings subject to V.R.F.P. 18 at the discretion of the mediator or by order of the court.
f. Promulgation Order Adding V.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(4)
The addition of Rule 11(a)(4) provides an additional procedure whereby a defendant may preserve a
post-conviction relief (PCR) challenge to a predicate conviction while pleading guilty or no contest to an
enhanced offense, where the State has not consented to preservation of the challenge under the terms of
Rule 11(a)(3). The amendment provides that, with the approval of the court, a defendant may preserve a
PCR challenge to a predicate conviction when entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere even in cases
where there is no plea agreement, or consent to the preservation otherwise given by the State, by stating
on the record at the change-of-plea hearing an intent to challenge one or more of the convictions through
a PCR petition, specifically identifying the convictions to be challenged, and stating the basis for the
challenges.
g. Promulgation Order Amending A.O. 14
This Order, promulgated on April 18, 2022, effective immediately, replaces Justice Robinson
with Justice Waples as the Justice responsible for entertaining motions for Area III.
II. PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS
(NOTE: THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN PROPOSED AND HAVE
NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT.)
a. Proposed Order Amending V.R.A.P. 33.1 and 34
The proposed amendments to Rule 33.1 and 34 update provisions regarding remote oral argument.
Because of the health concerns posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Vermont Supreme Court began
holding remote oral arguments in April 2020. The arguments were conducted using Webex with Justices,
attorneys, and self-represented parties appearing by video or audio. Public access to the remote oral
arguments was provided by a live stream. The Court conducted a survey of members of the bar on
attorneys’ experiences with remote oral argument. Many respondents reported that remote argument was an
efficient use of time and was a good balance between service and cost to the client. Other respondents
preferred argument in the courtroom and missed the formality of in-person argument. The majority of
respondents indicated they would choose in-person for full-Court arguments and remote for hearings
before a three-Justice panel.
Rule 33.1(b)(2) is added to default to remote oral argument before a three-Justice panel. An in-person
oral argument is available under (b)(3) if the parties file a stipulation or a party files a motion and
demonstrates good cause. Under new proposed Rule 34(c), the default is that oral arguments before the full
Court are scheduled for in-person participation. A remote oral argument is available under (d) if the parties
file a stipulation or a party files a motion and demonstrates good cause. In either case, the stipulation or
motion must be filed by the deadline set for requesting oral argument. This advance notice is necessary so
that the case can be properly calendared for in-person or remote hearing. An in-person hearing is not
available when one party is incarcerated and self-represented.
Former 34(c)-(j) are redesignated (e)-(l).
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by June 20, 2022, to Emily Wetherell,
Deputy Clerk, at the Vermont Supreme Court, at the following address:
Emily Wetherell, Deputy Clerk
emily.wetherell@vermont.gov
b. Proposed Order Amending A.O. 41 § 4 and Adding § 18
The proposed amendments to Administrative Order 41 include provisions regarding coverage of
malpractice insurance. A joint committee made of members from the Professional Responsibility
Board and the Vermont Bar Association met several times, studied the approaches of several
jurisdictions, and heard from a variety of individuals, including attorneys involved in attorney
discipline and malpractice cases, and representatives of title and malpractice insurers. The committee
proposed that the A.O. 41 be amended to require that the annual licensing statement include a
section requiring lawyers to disclose their insurance status. New § 4(a)(8) implements that
requirement. New § 18 provides details of the required disclosure, exempting government attorneys,
in-house counsel, and attorneys not on active status. Section 18(d) provides that the information
regarding insurance coverage is publicly available, but delays public availability until after a full
license renewal period has passed. For example, if the rule takes effect in 2022 after the July 1
renewal date, then the information will not be publicly available until after July 1, 2024, so that it
will not appear that some attorneys are uninsured when, in fact, they have not yet had an opportunity
yet to report their insurance coverage.
Comments on this proposed amendment should be sent by June 20, 2022, to Michael Kennedy,
Bar Counsel, Professional Responsibility Program, at the following address:
Michael Kennedy, Bar Counsel
Michael.Kennedy@vermont.gov
c. Proposed Order Amending A.O. 9, Rules 7, 8, 20 and 26
The proposed amendment to Rule 7(B) rescinds the limitation on the number of terms that an
Assistance Panel member may serve. Given the nondisciplinary format and goals of the Bar
Assistance Program, the value of experienced members, and the relatively small pool of potential
members, there is no reason to limit terms.
The proposed amendment to Rule 7(C) rescinds the requirement that at least one member of an
Assistance Panel be a current member of the Board. With only seven volunteer members, this
requirement puts an unreasonable expectation on Board members’ time. Board members remain
eligible to volunteer to serve as members of assistance panels.
The proposed amendments to Rule 8(A) and (B) clarify the scope of the confidentiality of all
information, communications, and records received and generated by the Bar Assistance Program.
Nearly all information disclosed to or by the Bar Assistance Program or otherwise maintained within
the Bar Assistance Program is confidential.
Proposed new paragraph (C) is added to clarify that all information, communications, and records
related to matters considered by Assistance Panels are confidential.
Proposed new paragraph (D) is added to clarify the situations in which otherwise confidential
information, communications, or records must be disclosed. Paragraph (D) loosely tracks Vermont
Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6(b) and is intended to clarify that Bar Counsel and the Bar
Assistance Program must disclose information in the specified situations, as would a lawyer in a
lawyer-client relationship.
Old paragraph (C) is relabeled a paragraph (E) and is amended for clarity and to strengthen the
confidentiality of information, communications, and records.
Old paragraph (D) is relabeled as paragraph (F) and is amended to clarify the situations in which
otherwise confidential information, communications, or records may be disclosed. Paragraph (F)
loosely tracks V.R.Pr.C. 1.6(c) and is intended to permit Bar Counsel or the Bar Assistance Program
to disclose information in situations in which a lawyer would be permitted to do so in a lawyer-client
relationship.
Old paragraph (E) is relabeled as paragraph (G) and is amended to reflect that, on occasion, the
Professional Responsibility Program might contract with an attorney to serve when Bar Counsel has
a conflict of interest or is otherwise unable to serve.
Old paragraph (F) is relabeled as paragraph (H) and is amended make clear that the confidentiality
provisions of Rules 5, 6, and 7 encompass all who might work or volunteer in or for the Bar
Assistance Program.
The proposed amendment to Rule 20 reflects the 2021 amendments that created the role of
Screening Counsel.
The proposed amendment to Rule 26(D) conforms with paragraph B and to clarify that lawyers
who are suspended for 6 months or longer must petition for reinstatement to the active practice of
law. By contrast, lawyers who are suspended for less than 6 months may resume practicing upon the
expiration of the suspension.
Comments on these proposed amendments should be sent by June 20, 2022 to Michael Kennedy,
Bar Counsel, Professional Responsibility Program, at the following address:
Michael Kennedy, Bar Counsel
Michael.Kennedy@vermont.gov
III. ODYSSEY FILE & SERVE AND PUBLIC PORTAL INFORMATION
All Superior Courts, including the Environmental Division, the Judicial Bureau, and the Supreme
Court are using Odyssey and accepting electronic filings through Odyssey File & Serve. Please use
the following links to access Odyssey electronic filing and portal systems and for more information.
Reminders for OFS Users:
1) PDFs must be “flattened” prior to efiling through Odyssey File & Serve
With the increased use in electronic signature tools, it is important for OFS filers to
remember that all PDFs must be flattened prior to filing in OFS. In order to eFile a form-
fillable PDF or a PDF that has been electronically signed, you must first save them as a flat
file. Otherwise, the filing will fail and you will need to refile.
Follow the steps below to "flatten" a completed PDF:
1. Open the completed PDF.
2. Right click on document and select Print. NOTE: if document opens in Adobe, Select
File and select Print.
3. Select the PDF printer. (The Adobe PDF printer is installed automatically with Adobe
Acrobat. Numerous free PDF printer
drivers are available for download from the Internet.)
4. Select OK.
5. Specify location to save the printed, "flattened" version of the form.
6. Select Save
2) Attorneys must select the party they represent as the “person responsible for fees” in the Fee
section of the filing process. Additionally, when the attorney represents more than one party,
attorneys should continue to select the same party as the “person responsible for fees”;
otherwise, the attorney will incur an additional efiling use fee.
Odyssey File & Serve. Odyssey File & Serve (OFS) is the platform through which you
electronically file with the courts. To access OFS, please visit https://vermont.tylerhost.net/ofsweb
You can access user guides through the “User Guides” link in the “Self Help” window. You can also
access docket-specific user guides and a new Frequently Asked Questions on the judiciary’s website
at www.vermontjudiciary.org/efiling
For technical support regarding Odyssey File & Serve, please contact Tyler Technologies at 800-
297-5377 or efiling.support@tylertech.com
If you have procedural questions about OFS, please email the judiciary at
JUD.EFileSupport@vermont.gov
Odyssey Public Portal. The Odyssey Public Portal allows you to view your case files. To access the
portal, please visit https://publicportal.courts.vt.gov/Portal/ Before you can view your case files, you
must first register in the portal and then request elevated access. The Public Portal User Guide
contains instructions on how to register and request elevated access. You can read the user guide on
our website at https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/public-portal
For technical support regarding the Public Portal, please contact the Vermont Judiciary’s HelpDesk
at Jud.helpdesk@vermont.gov When emailing, please write “Public Portal” in the subject line.
IV. FILING OF EXHIBITS
Per the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing, all electronically filed documents (including
exhibit lists and exhibits) must be submitted in PDF format. It is recommended that the exhibit list
be filed in Odyssey File & Serve (OFS) as a “Lead Document” and that any PDF exhibits be filed as
attachments to that exhibit list.
Multimedia files that cannot be converted to PDF format should be submitted by nonelectronic
means on a CD, DVD, or USB flash drive (aka thumb drive) and can be mailed or delivered to the
court. It is recommended that filers indicate this on the exhibit list being filed in OFS. Please note
that while the courts are equipped to view common multimedia formats (such as .mp3, .mp4, .mpeg,
.mov, .wmv files), the filer will have to provide compatible player software if an exhibit is in a
proprietary multimedia format.
Finally, please remember that regardless of how an exhibit is filed, it is the filer’s responsibility
during a hearing to present the exhibits. During remote hearings, this means the filer must either
assure that all witnesses have been provided with the marked exhibits in advance and have them
available to view; or be able to share his or her screen to allow all participants to view the exhibit. If
the exhibit is a video or audio file, the litigant must be prepared to play it during the hearing.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
a. Court Forms
Court forms are constantly being updated. Please refer to the judiciary website for the most up-to-date forms, https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/court-forms
Please use the link below to report any form question, concern or issue
http://www.vermontjudiciary.org/website-feedback-form or you can access our Website Feedback
program at the bottom of each web page.
b. Obligation under A.O. 41
Attorneys are reminded that an “attorney must report to the State Court Administrator within thirty
days any change of the office mailing or electronic mail address” and that “[n]otice sent to a reported
address is sufficient even if not received by the attorney because of failure to report the proper
address or failure of delivery not caused by the court.” A.O. 41, § 4(c). To update changes in your
contact information, please access your attorney account with the Attorney Portal
To ensure you continue to receive these emails, please add JUD.AttyLicensing@vermont.gov and
JUD.CAOMemotoBar@vermont.gov to your Safe Senders list.
c. eCabinet Registration
Administrative Order No. 44 requires attorneys in active status to register up to three email
addresses in eCabinet for purposes of receiving notices of hearing and other documents. You may
include staff email addresses in the three email addresses that you specify.
If you have already registered in eCabinet, the email address(es) you provided as part of that
process will be used.
If you have not already registered in eCabinet, please go to https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/
click Register Now, and follow the simple prompts. This website works best with Explorer.
Attorneys will need their attorney license numbers to register. Helpful information about the
Attorney Email Registration process is also available on the Electronic Filing page of the judiciary
website at https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/about-vermont-judiciary/electronic-access/electronic-filing Please contact jud.helpdesk@vermont.gov or call the Helpdesk at 802-828-4357 with any
questions in the meantime.
You are also reminded that you are required to update the email address(es) and other contact
information you have registered as soon as there are any changes, including changes to staff email
addresses you may have included with your registration. To revise the information, please go to
https://efiling.eservices.crt.state.vt.us/ log into eCabinet, click “Account,” choose “My Profile,”
and make the necessary changes to your contact information.
Updating information in the Attorney Portal or in eCabinet does not automatically notify the
other. It is your responsibility to update both. If you are a member of the Vermont Bar Association,
you will also need to separately notify the VBA.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
b5184a129d7f799c92ef09d63043fc61b08aaeb21e7c3a0f55d05021e1ab33e8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.